ISSN:
1573-904X
Keywords:
oral absorption
;
humans
;
dogs
;
rats
;
interspecies scale-up
;
pharmacokinetics
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
Abstract Purpose. To conduct a retrospective evaluation of using dog as ananimal model to study the fraction of oral dose absorbed (F) of 43drugs in humans and to briefly discuss potential factors that mighthave contributed to the observed differences in absorption. Methods. Mean human and dog absorption data obtained under fastedstate of 43 drugs with markedly different physicochemical andpharmacological properties and with mean F values ranging from 0.015 to1.0 were obtained from the literature. Correlation of F values betweenhumans and dogs was studied. Based on the same references, additionalF data for humans and rats were also obtained for 18 drugs. Results. Among the 43 drugs studied, 22 drugs were virtuallycompletely absorbed in both dogs and humans. However, the overallcorrelation was relatively poor (r2 = 0.5123) as compared to the earlier ratvs. human study on 64 drugs (r2 = 0.975). Several drugs showed muchbetter absorption in dogs than in humans. Marked differences in thenonliner absorption profiles between the two species were found forsome drugs. Also, some drugs had much longer Tmax values andprolonged absorption in humans than in dogs that might be theoreticallypredicted. Data on 18 drugs further support great similarity in F betweenhumans and rats reported earlier from our laboratory. Conclusions. Although dog has been commonly employed as ananimal model for studying oral absorption in drug discovery anddevelopment, the present study suggests that one may need to exercise cautionin the interpretation of data obtained. Exact reasons for the observedinterspecies differences in oral absorption remain to be explored.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007552927404
