ISSN:
1432-1351
Keywords:
White noise analysis
;
Cross correlation
;
Nonspiking interneuron
;
Cercal system
;
Cockroach
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
,
Medicine
Notes:
Summary 1. A novel approach using a Gaussian white noise as stimulus is described which allowed quantitative analysis of neuronal responses in the cercal system of the cockroach,Periplaneta americana. Cerci were stimulated by air displacement which was modulated by a sinusoidal and a white noise signal (Figs. 1 and 3). During the stimulation, intracellular recordings were made from a uniquely identifiable, nonspiking, local interneuron which locates within the terminal abdominal ganglion. The white noise stimulation was cross-correlated with the evoked response to compute first- and second-order kernels that could define the cell's response dynamics. 2. The interneuron, cell 101, has an exceptionally large transverse neurite that connects two asymmetrical dendritic arborizations located on both sides of the ganglion (Fig. 2). 3. The first-order Wiener kernels in cell 101 were biphasic (differentiating) (Fig. 5). The waveforms of the kernels produced by the ipsilateral and contralateral stimulations were roughly mirror images of each other (Figs. 7 and 8): the kernels produced by wind stimuli on the side ipsilateral to the cell body of the interneuron are initially depolarized and then hyperpolarized, whereas those on the other side are initially hyperpolarized. The polarity reversal occurred along the midline of the animal's body, and no well-defined kernel was produced by a stimulus directed head on or from the tail (Fig. 8). 4. Mean square error (MSE) between the actual response and the model prediction suggests that the linear component in cell 101 comprises half of the cell's total response (MSEs for the linear models were about 50% at preferred directions), whereas the second-order, nonlinear component is insignificant (Figs. 10 and 11). The linear component of the wind-evoked response was bandpass with the preferred frequency of 70–90 Hz (Figs. 5, 11, and 12). 5. Accounting for a noise, we reasonably assumed that at high frequencies the graded response in cell 101 is linearly related to a modulation of the air displacement and sensitive to the rate of change of the signal (i.e., wind velocity) and the direction of its source. It is suggested that the dynamics of the first-order kernel simply reflect the dynamics of sensory receptors that respond linearly to wind stimulation.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00199603
