Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of molecular medicine 60 (1982), S. 1401-1407 
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Drug Interaction ; Cimetidine ; Metoprolol, propranolol, atenolol ; Chronic treatment ; Arzneimittelinteraktion ; Cimetidin ; Metoprolol, Propranolol, Atenolol ; Chronische Therapie
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Die Pharmakokinetik von Metoprolol, Propranolol und Atenolol wurde nach jeweils 7tägiger oraler Monotherapie mit diesen Substanzen und nach 7tägiger kombinierter Gabe jedes Betablockers zusammen mit Cimetidin bei 6 gesunden Probanden geprüft. Cimetidinapplikation führte zu keiner Änderung des kinetischen Verhaltens von Atenolol. Demgegenüber stiegen nach Cimetidingabe die maximalen Metoprolol-Plasmaspiegel durchschnittlich um 70% und die von Propranolol um 95% im Vergleich zur Monotherapie mit diesen beiden Betablockern an (P〈0,05). Ähnlich verhielt sich die AUC beider Betablocker unter zusätzlicher Therapie von Cimetidin (P〈0,05). Bis auf einen geringen, jedoch nicht signifikanten Anstieg der Eliminationshalbwertzeit von Metoprolol und Propranolol bei gleichzeitiger Cimetidingabe wurden andere kinetische Parameter dieser beiden Pharmaka durch Cimetidin nicht bemerkenswert verändert. Die am 6. Tag jeder Behandlungsphase gemessene Hemmung der belastungsabhängigen Tachykardie ergab keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen der Monotherapie mit den jeweiligen Betablockern und deren kombinierter Gabe mit Cimetidin. Außer einem Probanden, der am 6. Tag der Therapie mit Metoprolol und Cimetidin über Angstgefühl, Schwäche und Schweißausbruch klagte, wurden weder in der Behandlungsperiode von Cimetidin mit den 3 Betablockern noch in den Monotherapiephasen Nebenwirkungen beobachtet.
    Notes: Summary Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, propranolol, and atenolol were investigated in six healthy volunteers following 7 days of oral monotherapy with these drugs, and after 7 days concurrent administration of each of these betareceptor antagonists with cimetidine. Application of cimetidine did not lead to any interaction with atenolol, whereas mean peak plasma levels of metoprolol were increased by 70%, and those of propranolol by 95% due to concurrent administration of cimetidine (P〈0.05). The plasma level time curve (AUC) of the two above-mentioned beta blockers behaved similarly (P〈0.05). Other kinetic parameters of these two drugs were not influenced to a statistically significant extent by cimetidine, despite the tendency for the elimination half-life of metoprolol and propranolol to be prolonged when cimetidine is added. Measurement of exercise-induced tachycardia on the sixth day of administration showed no differences between monotherapy with the beta blockers and combined treatment with each of them together with cimetidine. Apart from one volunteer who complained of anxiety, weakness, and sweating on the sixth day of cimetidine/metoprolol administration, no adverse effects could be observed during the combination therapy with cimetidine and the beta blockers, nor during monotherapy with beta blockers.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 19 (1981), S. 65-71 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: atenolol ; haemodialysis ; renal failure ; pharmacokinetics
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary The pharmacokinetics of atenolol were determined following acute intravenous and chronic oral administration to 20 subjects with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 5 and 113 ml/min. Plasma levels in a further 5 patients on haemodialysis were measured after intravenous treatment. The mean half life of elimination increased from 5.9 h in patients with normal renal function to 42.1 h in preuraemic patients (GFR 〈10 ml/min) following a single i. v. dose. The half life of elimination following chronic oral administration was not significantly different. Mean peak plasma concentrations increased from 540 ng/ml in patients with normal renal function to 1493 ng/ml in preuraemic patients following chronic oral treatment with 100 mg/day. The mean half life of elimination during a single haemodialysis treatment was 4.3 h. In patients with a GFR 〉30 ml/min the normal daily dose of atenolol should be employed, in patients with a GFR between 10 and 30 ml/min the dose should be reduced by half, and in patients with a GFR 〈10 ml/min a reduction by three quarters of the normal dose is recommended.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...