ISSN:
1569-8041
Keywords:
chemotherapy
;
hematopoietic growth-factor support
;
high-dose chemotherapy
;
non-small-cell lung cancer
;
peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
;
treatment toxicity and mortality
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract Background: We conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the feasibilityand activity of combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide,cisplatin, and epirubicin in limited-stage (LS, stage I–IIIB) andextensive-stage (ES, stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). End-pointswere treatment-related morbidity and mortality, response rate, duration ofresponse, and survival. Patients and methods: Chemotherapy followed by granulocytecolony-stimulating factor was given at a dose of etoposide (500mg/m2), ifosfamide (4000 mg/m2), cisplatin (50mg/m2), and epirubicin (50 mg/m2) (VIP-E) to107 patients with NSCLC. Twenty-five patients with qualifying responsesproceeded to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem celltransplantation after etoposide (1500 mg/m2), ifosfamide(12,000 mg/m2), carboplatin (750 mg/m2) andepirubicin (150 mg/m2) (VIC-E) conditioning. Results of conventional-dose VIP-E: 35 of 102 (34%) evaluablepatients responded (2 CR's, 33 PR's), 33/102 patients (33%) showed nochange (NC); the remainder of patients progressed with therapy (PD). Objectiveresponse rate was 68% (4% CR, 64% PR) in LS-NSCLC and23% (1.4% CR, 21.4% PR) in ES-NSCLC. Median duration ofsurvival was 13 months in LS-NSCLC and 5.5 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-yearsurvival was 26% in LS and 2% in ES-NSCLC. Results of high-dose VIC-E: 23 of 24 evaluable patients improved ormaintained prior responses (92%), 1 patient showed NC. Treatmentmortality was 4%. Median duration of survival was 17 months in LS-NSCLCand 10 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-year survival was 30% in LS and8% in ES-NSCLC. Conclusion: Response-rates and survival after conventional-dose VIP-Echemotherapy are comparable to other published trials of combinationchemotherapy in NSCLC. Toxicity and mortality is acceptable in limited stage,but unacceptably high in extensive stage NSCLC. Although better response-rateswere achieved in the high-dose arm, they did not translate into improvedsurvival. Most stage IV NSCLC-patients will neither benefit from VIP-Econventional dose, nor from VIC-E high dose chemotherapy. Whether selectedLS-patients with partial or complete responses to VIP-E induction chemotherapycould benefit from dose intensification in an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant settingremains to be determined.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008209713568
Permalink
