Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 25 (1983), S. 639-641 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Lidocaine ; CSF penetration ; monoethylglycinxylidide ; glycinxylidide ; pharmacokinetics ; serum protein binding ; membrane permeability
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Penetration into lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of lidocaine and its active desethylated metabolite, monoethylglycinxylidide (MEGX), has been studied in 10 neurological patients after a single subcutaneous injection of 2 mg/kg prior to lumbar puncture. An HPLC method was used to assay lidocaine, MEGX and glycinxylidide (GX) in serum and CSF. The serum protein unbound fraction of lidocaine was determined by equilibrium dialysis. The mean peak serum lidocaine concentration was found 25 minutes after injection, and the corresponding peak CSF level occurred after 70 min. A similar slow penetration of MEGX into CSF was observed, which indicates low membrane permeability for these two agents. No GX was found. The steadily increasing CSF lidocaine/serum total lidocaine ratio throughout the period of study up to 120 min and the higher level in CSF than the corresponding unbound fraction of the total serum lidocaine indicate that serum protein binding is not the sole determinant of the penetration of lidocaine into lumbar CSF. Rapid accumulation in brain tissue and diffusion back into cerebral extracellular fluid and to lumbar CSF may also occur. The apparent slow membrane penetration of lidocaine and its desethylated metabolite may be one reason for the difficulty of controlling lidocaine infusion rates according to therapeutic effectiveness and side-effects.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology and head & neck 255 (1998), S. 119-123 
    ISSN: 1434-4726
    Keywords: Key words Cochlear blood flow ; Cochlear physiology ; Experimental vasodilatation ; Betahistine treatment
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism and site of action of betahistine dihydrochloride in the inner ear of the guinea pig. Betahistine-evoked increases in cochlear blood flow (CBF) have been presumed to be due to the drug effect on the later wall capillary bed or larger feeding vessels in the cochlea vascular system. As such, the mechanism of action could be due to inhibition of H3 receptors. Betahistine may also have a direct effect on postsynaptic H1/H2 receptors and/or an effect modulated by other autonomic receptors. Betahistine-evoked CBF responses were assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in the presence of an H3 agonist (α N-methylhistamine dihydrochloride), an H3 antagonist (thioperamide), an H2 antagonist (cimetidine) or an α2 antagonist (idazoxan). The effects of betahistine on circulation in the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) and ipsilateral stria vascularis (SV) were assessed using intravital microscopy (IVM). Findings showed that betahistine increased CBF and reduced systemic blood pressure (BP). In contrast, α N-methylhistamine dihydrochloride had no effect on baseline CBF or BP and did not influence betahistine-induced increases in CBF. Thioperamide reversed the effects of betahistine on CBF, but had no effect on baseline CBF or BP. Cimetidine had no marked effect on baseline CBF or betahistine-induced increases in CBF Idazoxan had no consistent effects on baseline CBF, but abolished the effect of betahistine on CBF. The mean increase of red blood cell velocity in SV capillaries was 15% and occurred without a demonstrable change in capillary diameters. In contrast, the diameter of the AICA increased by 17–20%, indicating that betahistine-evoked increases in CBF resulted primarily from vasodilatation of the AICA. We suggest that this effect may be mediated via presynaptic H3 heteroreceptors and autonomic α2 receptors.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...