Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1433-0385
    Keywords: Key words: Ultrasonically activated scalpel ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Liver resection. ; Schlüsselwörter: Ultraschalldissektor ; Leberchirurgie ; laparoskopische Chirurgie.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung. Wir berichten über einen neuen, ursprünglich für die laparoskopische Chirurgie entwickelten Ultraschalldissektor. Die Gewebedurchtrennung wird durch einen Sägemechanismus der vibrierenden Hochfrequenzklinge bewirkt, die gleichzeitige Denaturierung der Proteine führt zu einer Coagulation eröffneter Blutgefäße bis zu einem Durchmesser von 2–3 mm. Der wesentliche Vorteil gegenüber der Elektrocoagulation oder der Verwendung eines Lasers besteht in der nur geringen Hitzeentwicklung im umgebenden Gewebe bei gleichzeitig gutem blutstillenden Effekt. Das Gerät eignet sich nicht nur hervorragend zur Präparation und Gewebedissektion in verschiedenen Bereichen der laparoskopischen Chirurgie, sondern auch zur Durchtrennung des Leberparenchyms im Rahmen der laparoskopischen und offenen Leberchirurgie.
    Notes: Summary. We report on our experience with a new ultrasonically activated scalpel that has been developed for laparoscopic surgery. It works by means of a longitudinally vibrating blade or scissors and can be used for tissue dissection, coagulation and preparation. The high-frequency vibration causes denaturation of protein and thus allows coagulation of small vessels up to 2–3 mm. The most important advantages compared to electrocautery are very limited heat generation, no production of smoke and the lack of current flow through the patient. Because of this, the ultrasonically activated scalpell is an excellent instrument for different types of laparoscopic surgery, as well as for open liver resection.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1433-044X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Proximale Humerusfraktur ; Luxationsfraktur ; Mehrfragmentfraktur ; Prognosefaktoren ; Key words Proximal humeral fracture ; Fracture dislocation ; Displaced fracture ; Outcome
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Problem: The vascularity of the articular fragment is of key importance for the final outcome in three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head. Displacement of the articular segment may compromise the arterial blood supply to the humeral head and result in avascular necrosis. There is still controversy as to whether three- and four-part fracture dislocations (articular fragment outside the glenoid) have an even worse prognosis than displaced three- and four-part fractures. Patients and methods: Between January 1985 and May 1993, 102 patients with three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head were treated by ORIF (mostly tension band wiring) at our institution. In a retrospective study we analysed the functional (Constant 100 point score) and radiological outcome of 67 (66%) of these patients. There were 21 patients with fracture dislocations (FD), n = 5 type B2X, n = 5 type B3X, n = 3 type C2X, n = 8 type C3X, according to the classification of Habermeyer [7]. The ,,X`` represents the dislocation of the articular fragment, whereas the classification to each type is done after reduction of the head. The remaining 46 patients presented with displaced, but not dislocated, three- and four-part fractures (DF), n = 24 type B2, n = 7 type B3, n = 3 type C2, n = 12 type C3. Average follow-up was 25 months (7–72 months). Patients with FD were significantly younger (average age 50 years) than patients with DF (average age 63 years, P 〈 0.05) and showed a significantly higher incidence of traumatic nerve or plexus lesions (FD 19%, DF 2%, P 〈 0.05). Results: Concerning the functional results, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The FD patients even showed a slight tendency to better results than patients with DF. This was true for the three-part fractures (average Constant score 78 versus 67 points), as well as for the four-part fractures (average Constant score 62 versus 55 points). The significantly younger age of the FD patients may explain their better results. The entire group of patients with three-part fractures showed a significantly better functional outcome (average Constant score 68 points) than patients with four-part fractures (average Constant score 55 points, P 〈 0.05). The rate of partial and total avascular necrosis of the humeral head was strongly correlated to the fracture type (number of fragments, fracture of the anatomical or surgical neck, according to the classification of Habermeyer), but again there was no difference between the FD and DF group (B2X: 20%, B3X: 20%, C2X: 33%, C3X: 63%; B2: 25%, B3: 29%, C2: 33%, C3: 67%). Astonishingly, the FD were not associated with an increased rate of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Three (axillary nerve) out of the five observed primary nerve and plexus lesions had a full neurological recovery after 6–12 months; the two patients with alterations of the brachial plexus showed a slow tendency of improvement at follow-up (12 and 18 months), but still had gross muscular atrophy and impaired sensory function. Conclusion: In displaced three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head the dislocation of the articular segment does not seem to increase the risk of avascular necrosis, if treated by timely and careful ORIF with respect to the vascularity. Even with the increased risk of primary nerve and plexus lesions in fracture dislocations, good functional results can be achieved by early operative nerve decompression and fracture stabilization in this middle-aged patient group. However, older patients with displaced or dislocated four-fragment fractures through the anatomical neck (type C3) have a poor chance of a favourable outcome, and therefore primary prosthetic replacement should be considered.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...