Library

Notes: Helicobacter pylori is a gastric pathogen that is a major cause of peptic ulcer disease, has a role in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and is associated with gastric cancer. Yet, in a large proportion of the human population, H. pylori infection has no apparent adverse clinical consequences. Furthermore, recent research suggests that H. pylori may even confer protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease.The conflicting evidence surrounding H. pylori infection was discussed at a sponsored symposium in Helsinki, introduced by Professor P. Malfertheiner, with papers presented by Dr H. J. O'Connor, Professor R. M. Genta, Dr P. Unge and Professor A. T. R. Axon. Emerging epidemiological and retrospective evidence suggests that the presence of H. pylori infection may provide some protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is other evidence that shows no benefit of H. pylori for the protection of the oesophagus. It was felt that prospective, multicentre studies are needed to explore the H. pylori–gastroesophageal disease relationship further, to avoid confusing potential benefits with known risks.Following the symposium, a discussion on the relative risks and benefits for H. pylori eradication was provided by Professor Axon and Professor Blaser.Eradication of H. pylori has been recommended in a series of management guidelines issued by consensus groups. However, accurate estimates of the relative risks and benefits of H. pylori infection in the general population, as well as in specific patient groups, is essential in order to develop a management strategy.

Notes: Background:  Mycophenolate mofetil has been claimed to be effective and well tolerated in refractory inflammatory bowel disease although there is little information regarding its use in clinical practice.Aim:  To review our experience in achieving and maintaining remission in refractory inflammatory bowel disease and to document tolerability, major toxicity and efficacy.Methods:  A retrospective audit was performed of the records of all patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with mycophenolate mofetil (1–2 g/day) over a 3-year period.Results:  Thirty-nine patients were identified. Almost all had been intolerant of, or had not responded to azathioprine, and 38 were steroid-dependent. mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued in 22 patients, 11 due to intolerance and 10 because of lack of efficacy. Of the 17 on treatment at the end of the study period 16 were in remission and off all steroid therapy, but one needed infliximab to maintain remission. No major toxicity was noted and there was no major sepsis.Conclusions:  Approximately 40% of patients with severe refractory inflammatory bowel disease achieved remission and complete steroid withdrawal on mycophenolate mofetil therapy, almost 30% could not tolerate the drug, and a further 30% did not respond. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy may have a role for steroid-dependent patients refractory to azathioprine.

Notes: The manner in which Helicobacter pylori is transmitted is of fundamental importance when considering strategies for its control, yet to date no satisfactory explanation has been advanced to account for its spread from person to person. This is surprising for a disease that affects 50% of the world's population. Attempts to culture H. pylori from faecal material and saliva have met with difficulty, casting some doubt on the likelihood of a faeco-oral or oro-oral route of transfer. The infection is easily passed from person to person by gastric intubation.The hypothesis advanced in this paper is that the natural route of transmission is by gastric juice, specifically as a result of epidemic vomiting in childhood. This theory is supported by literature indicating that acute infection with H. is characterized by vomiting of achlorhydric mucus that may serve as a vehicle for transmission. The hypothesis is consistent with most of the epidemiological data that have been published on H. pylori infection, including its association with childhood overcrowding, the lack of a fixed hot water supply and disadvantaged social conditions.

Notes: Oral tobramycin for 7 days has been shown to be of benefit as an adjunct to conventional medication in acute ulcerative colitis. Eighty-one patients (40 who had received tobramycin; 41 placebo) who had been enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of this drug in acute disease were subsequently followed to determine whether this short-term benefit persisted. Relapse was defined as a liquid stool frequency of three times daily with rectal bleeding. Results were analysed by the log-rank test on Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Treatment failure was defined as a lack of response by the end of the acute trial period, or subsequent relapse. In a second analysis, only those entering remission at the end of the acute trial were considered, and followed to relapse. Although at the start of the follow-up period significantly fewer patients in the tobramycin group had failed (failed: tobramycin 9, placebo 24; not failed tobramycin 31; placebo 17;P= 0.001), the failure-free survival curves subsequently converged and did not differ significantly. After 1 and 2 years, the failure-free survival rates were 40% (S.E. = 7.8%) and 20% (S.E. = 6.3%) for the tobramycin group and 24% (S.E. = 6.7%) and 12% (S.E. = 5.1%) for the placebo group. When only those entering remission were considered, there was no significant difference in the relapse rates in the two groups. Benefit from tobramycin is therefore short-lived and may reflect short-term changes in the faecal flora.

Notes: Background: As many as 50% of patients with reflux symptoms have no endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis. This multicentre study was designed to assess symptom relief after omeprazole 20 mg once daily in patients with symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis. Methods: Patients (n=209) were randomized in a double-blind study to receive either omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n=98) or placebo (n=111) for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits and using daily diary cards, with patient-completed questionnaires providing additional data on symptoms and on psychological disturbance. Results: On completion, symptom relief favoured omeprazole: 57% of patients on omeprazole were free of heartburn (vs. 19% on placebo), 75% were free of regurgitation (47%) and 43% were completely asymptomatic (14%), each with P〈0.0001. Fewer patients in the omeprazole group required alginate/antacid relief medication (P〈0.05). Symptom relief (time to first heartburn-free day) was more rapid with omeprazole (2 vs. 5 days on placebo; P〈0.01). A greater reduction in anxiety occurred in the omeprazole group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Omeprazole 20 mg once daily is effective in providing relief of the symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with essentially normal oesophageal mucosa.

Notes: We report a patient who developed sulphasalazine-related hepatitis with a subsequent adverse reaction to rectal 5-amino salicylic acid, in the form of pain and fever without associated liver dysfunction, suggesting reactions to both components of sulphasalazine. Included is a review of the literature. Caution should be observed when prescribing 5-amino salicylic acid to sulphasalazine-intolerant patients.

Notes: Aims: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of an omeprazole/amoxycillin (OA) dual therapy Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen with an omeprazole/amoxycillin/metronidazole (OAM) triple therapy regimen. Methods: In this double-blind trial, conducted in 19 hospitals, 119 patients with symptomatic duodenal ulcer disease were randomized to receive either 14 days treatment with omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. and placebo followed by a further 14 days’treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (n= 59) or 14 days treatment with omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., followed by a further 14 days’treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (n= 60). H. pylori status was assessed by 13C-urea breath test at entry and at 4 weeks post-treatment. Results: H. pylori infection was eradicated in 46% of the OA treated patients and in 92% of the OAM treated patients, a mean difference of 46% (P 〈 0.0001, 95% CI for the difference: + 30 to + 62). In only one patient was the duodenal ulcer not endoscopically healed after 4 weeks of treatment (OA 100%; OAM 98% healed). There were no significant differences in speed of symptom relief or improvement in symptoms between the two groups. Both regimens were well tolerated, with 96% of patients completing the course, and only one patient withdrawing due to an adverse event. The only side-effect with a significantly higher incidence in the OAM group was diarrhoea, which occurred in 36% of patients compared to 16% of patients in the OA group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions: A regimen consisting of omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. for 14 days gives an appreciably higher H. pylori eradication rate than omeprazole and amoxycillin alone, with acceptable tolerability.

Notes: This paper reports a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of oral tobramycin in acute ulcerative colitis. Eighty-four patients with an acute relapse of ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive oral tobramycin or placebo for 1 week as an adjunct to steroid therapy. At endpoint, 31 of 42 (74%) in the tobramycin group achieved complete symptomatic remission compared with 18 of 42 (43%) in the placebo group (P= 0.008). The tobramycin group achieved better histological scores (P 〈 0.05) at endpoint. These findings show that treatment with oral tobramycin improves the short-term outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis in relapse.

Notes: Background. Helicobacter pylori infection leads to an increased risk of developing gastric cancer. The mechanism through which this occurs is not known. We aimed to determine the effect of H. pylori and gastritis on levels of DNA damage in gastric epithelial cells.Methods. Epithelial cells were isolated from antral biopsies from 111 patients. DNA damage was determined using single cell gel electrophoresis and the proportion of cells with damage calculated before and 6 weeks after eradication of H. pylori. Cell suspensions generated by sequential digestions of the same biopsies were assayed to determine the effect of cell position within the gastric pit on DNA damage.Results. DNA damage was significantly higher in normal gastric mucosa than in H. pylori gastritis [median (interquartile range) 65% (58.5–75.8), n = 18 and 21% (11.9–29.8), n = 65, respectively, p 〈 .001]. Intermediate levels were found in reactive gastritis [55.5% (41.3–71.7), n = 13] and H. pylori negative chronic gastritis [50.5% (36.3–60.0), n = 15]. DNA damage rose 6 weeks after successful eradication of H. pylori[to 39.5% (26.3–51.0), p = .007] but was still lower than in normal mucosa. Chronic inflammation was the most important histological factor that determined DNA damage. DNA damage fell with increasing digestion times (r = –.92 and –.88 for normal mucosa and H. pylori gastritis, respectively).Conclusions. Lower levels of DNA damage in cells isolated from H. pylori infected gastric biopsies may be a reflection of increased cell turnover in H. pylori gastritis. The investigation of mature gastric epithelial cells for DNA damage is unlikely to elucidate the mechanisms underlying gastric carcinogenesis.

Notes: Economic models have suggested that population Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment may be a cost-effective method of reducing mortality from gastric cancer. These models are conservative as they do not consider that the programme may reduce health service peptic ulcer and other dyspepsia costs. We have evaluated the economic impact of population H. pylori screening and treatment over 2 years in a randomized controlled trial and have incorporated the results into an economic model exploring the impact of H. pylori eradication on peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.〈section xml:id="abs1-2"〉〈title type="main"〉Methods:Subjects between the ages of 40 and 49 years were randomly invited to attend their local primary care centre. H. pylori status was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test and infected individuals were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin, 250 mg b.d., and tinidazole, 500 mg b.d., for 7 days or identical placebos. Economic data on health service costs for dyspepsia were obtained from a primary care note review for the 2 years following randomization. These data were incorporated into a Markov model comparing population H. pylori screening and treatment with no intervention.〈section xml:id="abs1-3"〉〈title type="main"〉Results:A total of 2329 of 8407 subjects were H. pylori positive: 1161 were randomized to receive eradication therapy and 1163 to receive placebo. The cost difference favoured the intervention group 2 years after randomization, but this did not reach statistical significance (£11.42 per subject cost saving; 95% confidence interval, £30.04 to – £7.19; P=0.23). Analysis by gender suggested a statistically significant dyspepsia cost saving in men (£27.17 per subject; 95% confidence interval, £50.01 to £4.32; P=0.02), with no benefit in women (– £4.46 per subject; 95% confidence interval, – £33.85 to £24.93). Modelling of these data suggested that population H. pylori screening and treatment for 1 000 000 45-year-olds would save over £6 000 000 and 1300 years of life. The programme would cost £14 200 per life year saved if the health service dyspepsia cost savings were the lower limit of the 95% confidence intervals and H. pylori eradication had only a 10% efficacy in reducing mortality from distal gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease.〈section xml:id="abs1-4"〉〈title type="main"〉Conclusions:Modelling suggests that population H. pylori screening and treatment are likely to be cost-effective and could be the first cost-neutral screening programme. This provides a further mandate for clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of population H. pylori screening and treatment in preventing mortality from gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease.