Library

Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Objective: The data of 60 postoperatively sedated and ventilated patients were studied for analysis of oesophageal, bladder, and rectal temperatures. The purpose of the investigation was to clarify whether changes of oesophageal temperature are adequately reflected by bladder and rectal temperatures and whether the rate of rewarming has an influence on the accuracy of the latter two sites. Methods: For temperature recording, a Hi-Lo Temp® esophageal stethoscope (Mallinckrodt Medical), a Foley FC400-18 catheter temperature sensor (Respiratory Support Products, Mallinckrodt Medical), and a rectal temperature probe N401 (YSI) were used. Each probe and matching recording unit was calibrated over a range of 30–40 °C against a reference quartz thermometer (Hewlett packard Model 2801 A) in a thermostated water bath before the investigation. Five measuring points distributed over the whole period of rewarming were evaluated. Patients were assigned to groups with slow and fast rewarming, respectively. Agreement between the methods of measurement was assessed as described by Bland and Altman. Furthermore, differences between the oesophageal and bladder or rectal temperature were checked at each measuring point for statistical significance using the t-test. Results: In regard to oesophageal temperature, the bladder and rectal temperatures had biases of –0.01 °C and –0.03 °C, respectively. Limits of agreement (±2 s) were ±0.68 °C and ±0.82 °C, respectively. The bias of the bladder temperature was independent of the rate of rewarming (Fig. 3). The bias of the rectal temperature, however, differed in regard to the rewarming rate, being +0.06 °C in the group with slow rewarming and –0.13 °C in the group with fast rewarming (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1 and 2). These differences were significant for the measuring points 4 and 5 (Fig. 4). Conclusions: Bladder and rectal temperatures can accurately indicate the oesophageal temperature with a very small bias in postoperatively sedated and ventilated patients. Since the rate of rewarming influences the accuracy of rectal temperature readings, monitoring of bladder temperature seems to be more favourable in the postoperative period.

Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Heat loses during surgery occur mainly to the environment and due to infusions and irrigations. Infusions given at room temperature account for a great deal of the total heat deficit during major operations, e.g., the infusion of 53 ml/kg 20° C fluid leads to a loss of 1° C in mean body temperature. Hence, heating i.v. fluids will add to the effect of other measures aimed at reducing heat loss to the environment. We investigated the efficacy of different warming methods for i.v. fluids in an experimental model by measuring the temperature at the end of the delivery line. Methods. The following in-line warmers were studied: Hotline HL-90 and System H-250/heat exchanger D-50 (Level 1 Technologies, Marshfield, USA), Astotherm IFT 260 (Stihler Elektronic GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany), RSLB 30 H Gamida (Productions Hospitalieres Francaises, Eaubonne, France), Bair Hugger 241/Modell 500 Prototype (Augustine Medical, Eden Prairie, USA). They were compared with prewarming infusions (39° C) only using the Clinitherm S (Labor Technik Barkey GmbH, Bielefeld, Germany) and prewarming with “active insulation” of the delivery line using the Autotherm/Autoline system (Labor Technik Barkey GmbH, Bielefeld, Germany). We investigated the influence of four variables on the efficacy of warming: (1) flow rate (50–15,000 ml/h); (2) ambient temperature (20° C and 25° C); (3) infusion bag temperature (6° C, 20° C, and 39° C); and (4) length of infusion system downstream from the heat exchanger. Fluid temperatures were measured using thermistors of 1 mm diameter (Modell YSI 520, Yellow Springs Instruments Co., Yellow Springs, USA) incorporated into 3-way stopcocks. Temperatures were recorded using Hellige temperature monitors (Hellige GmbH, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany) and the signals were collected at 10 Hz through an AD converter and averaged over 1 min. Flows were calculated by timed collection into calibrated cylinders; 10 to 12 different flow rates were taken to define one temperature/flow plot. Effective warming was defined as a temperature 〉33° C at the end of the infusion line. Results. At high flow rates (〉2,500 ml/h) using 20° C fluids at 20° C ambient temperature, the H-250/D-50 system gave the highest temperatures throughout the range and showed effective warming from 1,300 ml/h on over the entire range tested (35° C at 17,000 ml/h) compared to the RSLB 30 H Gamida system (3,000–18,000 ml/h) (Fig. 2). This difference in performance was almost abolished with fluids at 6° C (Fig. 4). Similar efficacy could be reached by using prewarmed infusions that gave effective warming at 〉2,000 ml/h and reached 39° C at 13,000 ml/h. Prewarmed infusions could be used effectively down to 〉80 ml/h applying “active insulation” (Autotherm/Autoline) to the whole infusion system. The Hotline HL-90 (50–4,700 ml/h) appeared to be the most effective in-line warmer in the low (〈250 ml/h) and middle (250–2,500 ml/h) flow range, followed by the Astotherm IFT 260 (400–4,000 ml/h), but only if used with a length of 40 cm down-stream from the heat exchanger (Fig. 1). Increasing this distance to 145 cm markedly reduced its efficacy below the range of 2,000 ml/min (1,200–3,000 ml/h) (Fig. 5). The Bair Hugger 241 Prototype showed a narrow effective range (700–1,300 ml/h) that could be extended beyond 1,300 ml/h by the use of prewarmed infusions (Figs. 1 and 3). The performance for 6° C solutions and ambient temperatures of 25° C are given in Fig. 4 and Table 1. Conclusions. The importance of infusion warming increases with the amount of fluid given. In general, the infusion bag temperature only influenced the efficacy of in-line warmers within the high-flow range, challenging the performance of the heat exchanger. The length of uninsulated i.v. line downstream from the heat exchanger influenced the efficacy within the low- and middle-flow range, as did the room temperature. Prewarmed solutions can be infused very effectively within the high-flow range. This efficiency can be preserved down to the low-flow range by using “active insulation” of the infusion system. In-line warming is essential for emergency and rapid massive transfusions.

Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Temperature of the tympanic membrane is recommended as a “gold standard” of core-temperature recording. However, use of temperature probes in the auditory canal may lead to damage of tympanic membrane. Temperature measurement in the auditory canal with infrared thermometry does not pose this risk. Furthermore it is easy to perform and not very time-consuming. For this reason infrared thermometry of the auditory canal is becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice. We evaluated two infrared thermometers – the Diatek 9000 Thermoguide and the Diatek 9000 Instatemp – regarding factors influencing agreement with conventional tympanic temperature measurement and other core-temperature recording sites. In addition, we systematically evaluated user dependent factors that influence the agreement with the tympanic temperature. Materials and Methods. In 20 volunteers we evaluated the influence of three factors: duration of the devices in the auditory canal before taking temperature (0 or 5 s), interval between two following recordings (30, 60, 90, 120, 180 s) and positioning of the grip relative to the auditory-canal axis (0, 60, 180 and 270°). Agreement with tympanic contact probes (Mon-a-therm tympanic) in the contralateral ear was investigated in 100 postoperative patients. Comparative readings with rectal (YSI series 400) and esophageal (Mon-a-therm esophageal stethoscope with temperature sensor) probes were done in 100 patients in the ICU. The method of Bland and Altman was taken for comparison. Results. Shortening of the interval between two consecutive readings led to increasing differences between the two measurements with the second reading decreasing. A similar effect was seen when positioning the infrared thermometers in the auditory canal before taking temperatures: after 5 s the recorded temperatures were significantly lower than temperature recordings taken immediately. Rotation of the devices out of the telephone handle position led to increasing lack of agreement between infrared thermometry and contact probes. Mean differences between infrared thermometry (Instatemp and Thermoguide, CAL-Mode) and tympanic probes were −0.41±0.67 °C (2 SD) and −0.43 ±0.70 °C, respectively. Mean differences between the Thermoquide (Rectal-Mode) and rectal probe were −0.19±0.72 °C, and between the Thermoguide (Core Mode) and esophageal probe −0.13±0.74 °C. Discussion. Although easy to use, infrared thermometry requires careful handling. To obtain optimal recordings, the time between two consecutive readings should not be less than two min. Recordings should be taken immediately after positioning the devices in the auditory canal. Best results are obtained in the 60° position with the grip of the devices following the ramus mandibulae (telephone handle position). The lower readings of infrared thermometry compared with tympanic contact probes indicate that the readings obtained represent the temperature of the auditory canal rather than of the tympanic membrane itself. To compensate for underestimation of core temperature by infrared thermometry, the results obtained are corrected and transferred into core-equivalent temperatures. This data correction reduces mean differences between infrared recordings and traditional core-temperature monitoring, but leaves limits of agreement between the two methods uninfluenced.