Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 8 (1994), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1365-2036
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Methods: this US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study determined the effects of two twice daily oral famotidine regimens on symptom relief and healing of erosive oesophagitis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Three hundred and eighteen patients were enrolled: 66 received placebo, 125 received famotidine 20 mg b.d., and 127 received famotidine 40 mg b.d. Patients maintained diaries of their symptoms. Endoscopy was performed at weeks 0 and 6, and again at week 12 if healing had not occurred. Results: healing at 6 and 12 weeks was (respectively) 48% (P 〈 0.01 vs. placebo) and 69% (P≫ 0.01 vs.placebo) for famotidine 40 mg b.d.; 32% and 54% (P≫ 0.01 vs. placebo) for famotidine 20 mg b.d., and 18% and 29% for placebo. At both 6 and 12 weeks the healing rates of famotidine 40 mg b.d. were significantly greater than placebo and famotidine 20 mg b.d. Compared to placebo, famotidine produced more frequent global symptom improvement and more rapid heartburn relief. There were no significant differences among treatment groups in the incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events. Conclusions: famotidine 40 mg b.d. was a better regimen than famotidine 20 mg b.d. or placebo. The clinical efficacy paralleled the previously documented effect of the famotidine regimens on decrease of oesophageal acid exposure.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1365-2036
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: To define the optimum doses of omeprazole appropriate for acute and long-term therapy of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, 24-h oesophageal pH was measured in 12 patients with symptomatic reflux and an abnormal 24-h oesophageal acid exposure time (〉 6%) in a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover study comparing the effects of omeprazole 10, 20, or 40 mg/day and placebo. Total reflux time over 24 hours, number of reflux episodes per hour, and the number of reflux episodes lasting 〉 5 minutes were measured by ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. All doses of omeprazole were superior to placebo in decreasing gastro-oesophageal reflux as measured by each index.With placebo, oesophageal acid exposure was 16.3 % of the 24 hours, 10 mg omeprazole/day reduced that to 6.3 %, 20 mg/day lowered acid exposure to 0.9%, and 40 mg/day to 0.6%. Thus only the 20 and 40 mg doses reduced acid exposure to within the normal range. Similar results were obtained with the other indices of reflux. These data suggest that a rational dose regimen for reflux oesophagitis is 20 mg/day, a regimen that has proved effective in clinical trials. The present study indicates that 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring is a practical approach to the determination of drug dosage in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2 (1988), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1365-2036
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: The present study attempts to assess the alteration in patterns of gastro-oesophageal reflux as assessed by 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring by varying degrees of H2-receptor blockade with famotidine. Subjects were 12 patients with complaints of daily heartburn who demonstrated at least 6% of acid mucosal contact time by 24-h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring. All subjects had a positive Bernstein test, and nine of the 12 subjects had erosive oesophagitis. The study was conducted as a double-blind crossover design utilizing 40 mg nocte, 20 mg b.d., and 40 mg b.d. and placebo treatments. Results indicated that all treatments significantly reduced the 24-h percentage acid contact time (P 〈 0.05) compared to placebo. The two b.d. treatment regimens also significantly (P 〈 0.05) reduced the number of episodes lasting longer than 5 min. Only the b.d. regimens successfully lowered the percentage of upright acid exposure. All treatments significantly (P 〈 0.01) reduced the percentage of supine acid contact time, as well as the number of episodes lasting more than 5 min. It is concluded that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may well require a b.d. dosing regimen with farnotidine in order to achieve optimal mucosal healing and day time symptom control.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: duodenal ulcer ; acute therapy ; substituted benzimidazole ; omeprazole ; H2-antagonist ; ranitidine ; gastrin
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract To assess the comparative efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg, a proton pump inhibitor, versus ranitidine 150 mg twice a day, an H2-receptor antagonist, in healing duodenal ulcers we performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in 309 patients with endoscopically diagnosed ulcers. Patients were treated for up to four weeks and were seen at week 2 and at week 4, if unhealed at week 2, for determination of ulcer status by endoscopy, review of daily self-assessment symptom diaries, and clinical laboratory including fasting serum gastrin. Gastrin levels were repeated two weeks after cessation of study medication. Evaluation of baseline demographic and laboratory parameters demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups at entry. At week 2, 42% of the omeprazole and 34% of the ranitidine-treated patients were healed (P=NS). At week 4, there was a 19% advantage in ulcer healing for the omeprazole-treated patients in comparison to those treated with ranitidine (82% vs 63%, respectively,P〈0.05). Healing of ulcers ≥1.0 cm occurred in 83% of those treated with omeprazole versus 37% treated with ranitidine (P〈0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of pain relief or incidence of clinical laboratory abnormalities. Mean fasting serum gastrin value during treatment increased over the baseline in both groups, (P〈0.05). The percent change was significantly greater with omeprazole but few patients had elevations above the upper limit of normal for the assay. Both drugs were well tolerated. Omeprazole 20 mg demonstrated superiority in healing duodenal ulcers at four weeks in comparison to ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and was more effective in healing ulcers 〉-1.0 cm.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...