ISSN:
1573-2622
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract A comparative evaluation of the Octopus automated perimeter (Programmes 21 and 31), the Goldmann Bowl perimeter, the Bjerrum Screen and the Friedmann VFAs Mk I and Mk II was carried out on a heterogenous sample of 75 patients. Field loss was categorized using a modification of the classifications proposed by Greve (1982). The results were analysed using the Level 4 analysis developed by Flanagan, Wild, Barnes, Gilmartin, Good and Crews (1984a). The performance of the various test logics was found to differ between the categories of field defect.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00679798
Permalink