Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Metastatic breast cancer ; Vinorelbine ; Phase I/II
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Purpose: The Breast Cancer Site Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada – Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) undertook two parallel phase I studies to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of vinorelbine in combination with doxorubicin and fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid) in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Cohorts of five patients were to receive: (a) fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks (FAN regimen), or (b) fluorouracil 340 mg/m2 and folinic acid 200 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on day 1 and again on day 5 every 4 weeks (SUPERFAN regimen). Eligibility included measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer and having received neither previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease nor anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy. Results: Of 26 and 12 patients enrolled in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens, 26 and 12 were evaluable for toxicity and 21 and 9 for response, respectively. Median ages were 60.3 years (41–71 years) and 64.2 years (51–73 years). Both regimens required amendment after the first cohort with an original day-15 vinorelbine dose omitted from the FAN regimen and more prolonged nadir granulocyte counts allowed. Myelosuppression was dose limiting. MTDs in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens were vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2. Other toxicities included mucositis, septicemia and febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were mild. Of the 21 FAN patients evaluable for response, 3 (14%) had complete responses and 7 (33%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48%; 9 (43%) had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progressive disease as their best response. Of the nine SUPERFAN patients evaluable for response, none had a complete response. There were two (22%) with partial responses, and six (67%) had stable disease and one (11%) had progressive disease as their best response. Conclusions: The SUPERFAN regimen was too toxic to pursue even at the lowest dose. The recommended phase II starting dose for the FAN regimen was vinorelbine 20 mg/m2. Although these were phase I studies response rates in evaluable patients were less than expected and toxicity did not allow the use of as much vinorelbine in the combinations as had been anticipated. The limited response data from our study would imply that combining vinorelbine with more toxic agents may not enhance response rates and may defeat the advantage of tolerability, especially in elderly patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Breast cancer research and treatment 49 (1998), S. S59 
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: vorozole ; aromatase inhibitor ; review ; breast cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Vorozole (RivizorTM), is a triazole derivative and one of the new, third generation aromatase inhibitors. Vorozole causes reversible inhibition of cytochrome P450 aromatase with the majority of the aromatase inhibition activity attributable to the dextro-isomer. In vitro the IC50 against human placental aromatase and in cultured rat ovarian granulosa cells is 1.38 and 0.44 nM, respectively. Vorozole is selective and does not effect other cytochrome P450-dependent reactions at concentrations up to at least 500-fold the aromatase inhibiting concentration. In vitro vorozole, at concentrations of up to 10 μM, does not exhibit agonistic or antagonistic effects on steroid receptors including the estrogen, progestin, androgen and glucocorticoid receptors. In vivo vorozole produces dose-dependent inhibition of aromatase and reduces circulating estrogen levels. Vorozole has been shown to inhibit intratumoral aromatase activity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients pretreated for 7 days prior to undergoing mastectomy. Tissue estrone and estradiol levels were also shown to be decreased by 64% and 80%, respectively. In four phase II clinical trials, vorozole produced response rates of 18–33% corresponding to selective inhibition of estradiol. Vorozole has been examined in large, randomized multi-centre, controlled trials against both megestrol acetate (MA) and aminoglutethimide (AG) plus hydrocortisone. Against MA, response rates were comparable (10.5% vorozole; 7.6% MA) however, a trend towards improvement in median duration of response for vorozole (18.2 versus 12.5 months; p=0.07) was shown. No differences in time to progression or survival were noted. Significant and persistent weight gain associated with MA administration was the most notable difference in tolerability between the two agents. Against AG, vorozole showed a higher response rate (23% versus 18%) however this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.085). No differences in duration of response, time to progression and survival were noted. A significantly better Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) quality of life score was associated with vorozole compared to AG. Vorozole is a specific, selective and potent aromatase inhibitor and useful for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: liarozole ; metastatic breast cancer ; postmenopausal
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract This phase II study of liarozole fumarate (R85246, liarozole), a novel imidazole with retinomimetic and aromatase inhibitory effects, was designed to determine the efficacy and tolerability in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in progression, to correlate these effects with hormonal levels, and to evaluate quality of life. Twenty-nine women with ER-positive or unknown metastatic disease who received ≥ 2 prior hormonal therapies were treated with 150–300 mg liarozole twice daily until disease progression. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 25 for response. Four patients (16.0%, 95% CI 5.3–37.4%) had partial remission (PR) of their disease for a median of 7.4 months (range 1.2–12.9) and 7 (28%) had disease stabilization for a median of 4.8 months (1.6–16.0). Estradiol decreased from pre-treatment levels of 9.2–52 pM (mean 17.1) to below detection (9.2 pM, p=0.0005) after 1 month. Similarly estrone levels fell from 14–307 pM (mean 92.7) to below detection (9.2 pM, p=0.0001). The most common toxicity was dermatological (96.6%) with features compatible with hypervitaminosis A syndrome such as rash, pruritus, dry skin, and brittle nails. The majority of these were mild to moderate in severity. No significant improvement in quality of life scores (FLI-C) were noted. Liarozole is an active new treatment for breast cancer in patients heavily pre-treated with hormone therapies. Further studies are needed to confirm its relative efficacy in both receptor positive and negative postmenopausal breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Breast cancer research and treatment 62 (2000), S. 151-159 
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: aromatase ; estrogens ; EMSA ; GATA ; PII promoter ; silencer elements
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Approximately two thirds of breast cancer patients have estrogen-dependent carcinomas. The biosynthesis of estrogens is catalyzed by the microsomal enzyme aromatase. Mechanisms controlling human aromatase gene expression are complicated by the existence of multiple tissue specific promoters. The most proximally located PII promoter is mainly active in ovarian granulosa cells. PII can be switched on in human breast cancer cells. Since there are strong silencer elements located within the 3′ portion of the PII promoter, we propose that the function of these silencer elements could be reversed by breast cancer cell specific signals/factors, resulting in aberrant expression of aromatase. We have identified and characterized a novel silencer element, S2, which is upstream of S1, a silencer element recently identified by another group. S2, a 54-bp fragment 100% conserved between humans and rodents, functions in both orientation- and promoter-independent manners. The core region of S2 contains two consensus binding sites for members of the GATA transcription factors. GATA-4 was found to be expressed in three out of four human breast cancer cell lines examined by RT-PCR, and transfection with GATA-4 partially reversed the repressive function of S2. However, we were unable to demonstrate that DNA-protein complexes formed between nuclear extracts of human breast and ovarian cancer cells and S2 contain GATA-4 using a supershifting approach. We suggest that the expression of GATA-4, and more importantly, other yet to be identified GATA or GATA-related factor(s), are implicated in provoking aberrant expression of aromatase, and therefore, the biosynthesis of estrogens, in human breast cancer cells.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: aromatase inhibitor ; hormone independent ; liarozole ; metastatic breast cancer ; RAMBA
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Three phase II studies were conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of liarozole fumarate (R85246; liarozole), a retinoic acid metabolism blocking agent (RAMBA) and aromatase inhibitor. Additionally, animal experiments in the MNU-induced rat mammary tumor model and in immature ovariectomized rats were conducted to further elucidate liarozole's mechanisms of action. Patients were postmenopausal with either: ER negative disease in first relapse (Group 1; n = 16); ER positive or unknown disease refractory to tamoxifen (Group 2; n = 16); ER positive, negative or unknown disease resistant or refractory to chemotherapy (Group 3; n = 27). Treatment was liarozole (150–300 mg) twice daily orally until disease progression. Response rates were: 25% in group 1 (95% CI 11.0–52.3%; median duration (MD) 20 months; range 2–36.5); 25% in group 2 (95% CI 11.0–52.3%; MD 6.5 months; range 3.5–38); 11% in group 3 (95% CI 4.2–29.2%; MD 7 months; range 3–8.5). No significant improvement in quality of life scores (FLI-C) was noted. Toxicities observed were predominantly dermatological (skin disorders: 88%; dry mouth/eyes/lips: 69%). Plasma estradiol decreased from mean pre-treatment levels of 72.7 pM (9.1–1839 pM) to below detection (9.2 pM) after 1 month. Liarozole, but not vorozole, partially inhibited estradiol induced uterine hypertrophy and demonstrated dose-dependent anti-tumor effects in the rats, only partially overcome by coadministration of estradiol. The clinical responses observed, together with our preclinical results, confirm liarozole's dual mechanism of action and provide a rationale for further evaluation of RAMBAs in the treatment of breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISSN: 1534-4681
    Keywords: Breast cancer ; Quality of life ; Mental health ; Surgery
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: The aim of the present study was to examine whether type of surgery, age, and time since surgery influenced psychological distress and quality of life (QOL) in women treated for breast cancer. Methods: We surveyed 183 women who had undergone surgery for breast cancer. Psychological distress was measured with the Mental Health Inventory and QOL was measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Results: After controlling for stage of disease, radiation treatment, and age, there was a statistically significant interaction between type of surgery and time since surgery for the Mental Health Inventory total score, and a marginal interaction between type of surgery and time since surgery for the Global health status/QOL score. Women who had breast conservation surgery experienced significantly greater levels of psychological distress and marginally worse QOL from 40 months after surgery onward than did women who received a mastectomy. Conclusions: The effects of different surgical treatments for breast cancer on psychological distress and QOL become apparent only after a period of several years. Women, therefore, need counseling on the potentially positive and negative psychological implications of different surgical treatments for breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...