Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: azathioprine ; 6-mercaptopurine ; gastrointestinal ; pharmacokinetics ; bioavailability ; inflammatory bowel disease
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Azathioprine (AZA) is used in the treatment of patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease; however, its use is limited because of systemic toxicity associated with long-term use. Ileocecal delivery of AZA might be advantageous if local intestinal therapeutic effects could be provided with decreased systemic side effects. Decreased cecal systemic absorption would allow higher dosages of AZA to be administered. A two-phase study was performed to compare the systemic exposure of AZA and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) following administration of AZA into the stomach, jejunum, and cecum and to compare the systemic exposure to AZA and 6-MP following administration of three different dosages of AZA into the cecum. In phase I, six healthy male volunteers received three 50 mg sequential doses of AZA via an oral tube directly placed into the stomach, jejunum, and cecum, respectively. In phase II, six healthy male volunteers received three different dosages (50, 300, 600 mg of AZA) into the cecum. Plasma concentrations of AZA and 6-MP at various times were quantified and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and mean residence time (MRT) were determined. No significant differences in the AUC of AZA were seen at the different sites. The AUC of 6-MP following administration of AZA into the jejunum (67.0 ± 30.1 ng×hr/ml) was higher compared to the stomach (39.9 ± 38.1 ng/hr/ml) and cecum (29.2 ± 10.9 ng×hr/ml). Jejunal absorption was 68% higher than absorption from the stomach and 129% higher than that of the cecum. Gastric absorption was 27% higher than that of the cecum. Increased dosages given into the cecum resulted in increased AUCs of AZA and 6-MP. The AUCs of AZA following 50, 300, and 600 mg dosages were 16.9 ± 7.4, 52.3 ± 67.2, and 132 ± 151 ng×hr/ml, respectively, and the AUCs of 6-MP were 22.2 ± 14.9, 63.4 ± 50.6, and 104 ± 115 ng×hr/ml, respectively. Systemic exposure to 6-MP is reduced following administration of AZA into the cecum, most likely secondary to reduced absorption of 6-MP from the colon. Higher dosages of AZA presented to the cecum do result in increased systemic absorption, but may still allow more drug to be administered with less toxicity than the same dose received orally.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-904X
    Keywords: diazepam ; phenytoin ; ACC-9653 ; prodrug ; protein binding ; pharmacokinetics
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract The protein binding and pharmacokinetics of diazepam, ACC-9653 (a phenytoin prodrug), and phenytoin were evaluated in nine healthy male volunteers following administration of diazepam and ACC-9653, alone or concomitantly, in a randomized crossover design. No significant differences were observed in the fraction unbound or pharmacokinetic parameters of ACC-9653, phenytoin, or diazepam when ACC-9653 was administered alone compared to concomitant administration with diazepam. The phenytoin fraction unbound increased significantly with increased concentrations of ACC-9653, indicating displacement of phenytoin from its binding sites by ACC-9653. ACC-9653 also demonstrated concentration dependent binding. The lack of a significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ACC-9653 and diazepam suggests that these drugs may be safely administered together, although this conclusion should be confirmed in the intended patient population.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1573-904X
    Keywords: ranitidine ; drug absorption ; site of absorption
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract The absorption characteristics of ranitidine after delivery to three locations in the gastrointestinal tract were compared in an open-label study of eight healthy males. Subjects received ranitidine HCl (150 mg) for injection via a nasoenteric tube directly into their stomach, jejunum, or cecum sequentially in three separate periods (24 hr apart). Plasma samples were collected at periodic time intervals for 12 hr following each dosing and analyzed for ranitidine concentration by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mean concentrations following cecal dosing were lower (P 〈 0.05) than concentrations following gastric or jejunal dosing at each sampling time except baseline. Mean concentrations following gastric and jejunal dosing were similar except at 2 hr (gastric 〉 jejunal). Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cecal administration were different (P 〈 0.05) from either the gastric or the jejunal periods with the exception of Tmax. There was no difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter after gastric or jejunal dosing. The relative bioavailability after cecal administration was less than 15% of that observed after administration into the stomach or jejunum. Additionally, Wagner-Nelson analysis indicated that the rate of ranitidine absorption was much slower following cecal administration than after gastric or jejunal dosing. Two plasma concentration peaks were observed in three of eight subjects after gastric dosing, in eight of eight subjects after jejunal dosing, and in zero of eight subjects after cecal dosing. These data demonstrate that the absorption profile of ranitidine is equivalent, in extent and duration, after delivery to the stomach or jejunum, while absorption from the cecum is significantly less. In addition, the two plasma concentration peaks commonly seen with ranitidine administration are not secondary to variations in gastric emptying as has been hypothesized.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...