Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1398-9995
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Background Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine with additional anti-inflammatory properties, providing relief in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of 10 mg o.d. mizolastine given to patients with perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved 257 patients suffering from the disease for more than 10 years. They were allocated, after a 1-week placebo run-in, to receive mizolastine (n = 133) or placebo (n = 124) for 4 weeks. Results Mizolastine-treated patients showed significantly greater alleviation of nasal symptoms, with a mean decrease of 36% compared with pretreatment score, compared to a mean decrease of 10% in placebo patients (P〈0.001). Nasal blockade responded favorably to mizolastine compared to placebo and was associated with a significant reduction in rhinoscopy findings (P=0.030). Likewise, the mean ocular symptom score decreased 40% in mizolastine-treated patients compared to 7% in the placebo group (P〈0.003). The safety profile of mizolastine was satisfactory and similar to that of placebo. Conclusions In patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, mizolastine is a safe and potent treatment. Mizolastine's pronounced effect on nasal blockade could possibly be linked to its anti-inflammatory properties.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford BSL : Blackwell Science Ltd
    Clinical & experimental allergy 29 (1999), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1365-2222
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Some H1 antihistamines are at risk for rare but severe dysrhythmias due to an effect on the ventricular repolarization.〈section xml:id="abs1-2"〉〈title type="main"〉ObjectiveTo present an overview of the QT interval monitoring performed during the clinical development of mizolastine, a new selective second-generation H1 antihistamine.〈section xml:id="abs1-3"〉〈title type="main"〉MethodsThe ECGs database analysis of clinical studies conducted in volunteers and patients is summarized and focused on the results of reported studies and studies specifically designed for the assessment of the effect of mizolastine on cardiac repolarization, through the QT interval measurements. Mizolastine was orally administered up to 75 mg single dose and 40 mg repeated dose in healthy volunteers (i.e. 7.5 and 4 times the recommended dose, respectively) and at a dose of 10 or 15 mg in patients.〈section xml:id="abs1-4"〉〈title type="main"〉ResultsIn healthy volunteers, no increased incidence of QTc values 〉440 msec or ΔQTc ≥40 msec were recorded compared to placebo. No dose-related increase in QTc interval was observed. The ECG parameters were not modified by the co-administration of mizolastine with digoxin, diltiazem and erythromycin, when compared to the effect of each co-administered drug alone. In patients, the mean QTc interval changes from baseline did not significantly differ from placebo. In comparative studies vs. loratadine a similar incidence of out of range values was observed with mizolastine and loratadine.〈section xml:id="abs1-5"〉〈title type="main"〉ConclusionECG monitoring of volunteers and patients included in clinical studies conducted with mizolastine showed no significant effect of mizolastine on cardiac repolarization.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Allergy 51 (1996), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1398-9995
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine providing satisfactory symptom relief in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The purpose of this study was to use the wheal and flare skin reactions model to assess the maintenance of the pharmacodynamic effect of mizolastine, administered for 2 months. This double-blind, parallel-group study involved 60 atopic patients randomly allocated, after a 1-week placebo run-in, to once-daily 10 mg mizolastine (n= 29) or placebo (n= 31) groups. Treatment continued for 8 weeks. Prick tests were performed in duplicate with histamine chlorhydrate (10mg/ml), codeine phosphate (9%), and five increasing concentrations (1–500 reactivity index/ml) of standardized allergen extracts (grass pollen or mites) at days 0, 7, 28, 42, and 56. After 7 days of treatment, inhibition of histamine-induced wheal was -76% and + 20%, respectively, with mizolastine and placebo (P= 0.0001), in comparison with baseline; inhibition of flare was - 86% and + 50%, respectively, with mizolastine and placebo (P = 0.0001). Suppression was maintained to a similar extent throughout the study. Results were consistent between histamine-, codeine-, and allergen-induced tests. Safety was satisfactory in both groups. This study confirms mizolastine as a potent antihistamine which does not induce subsensitivity when taken for 8 weeks, and which can be safely recommended in allergic conditions.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1398-9995
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: The aim of the study was to determine whether IgG antibodies from patients on specific immunotherapy could inhibit skin test reactivity of allergens when mixed with them prior to testing. In a preliminary double-blind study, mite extracts were incubated with glycero-saline solution or non-specific IgG and used in testing 15 patients. Wheal and flare diameters produced with the two mite extracts did not differ significantly. In a second double-blind study with 15 other patients, skin tests using mite extracts incubated with either non-specific IgG or specific IgG showed significantly decreased diameters when mite extracts were preincubated with specific IgG. This result, in vivo, confirms the antigen neutralizing capacity of specific IgG demonstrated in vitro.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...