Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0428
    Keywords: Keywords Type II diabetes ; pharmacoepidemiology ; sulphonylurea ; metformin ; combination treatment ; mortality.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Aims/hypothesis. This study analysed cause-specific mortality in Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients using either sulphonylurea alone or in combination with metformin. Methods. Patients were followed from the first day they were taking either the combination or sulphonylurea alone. Odds ratios by Cox regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes, study area, year of inclusion and fasting blood glucose at inclusion. Results. We included 169 patients taking sulphonylurea and metformin in combination and 741 patients taking only sulphonylurea. Mean (range) follow-up time was 6.1 (0.1–13.0) years. The adjusted odds ratio for overall mortality was 1.63 (95 % confidence interval 1.27–2.09) in patients taking sulphonylurea and metformin combination vs those using sulphonylurea alone. For mortality from ischaemic heart disease and stroke the adjusted odds ratios were 1.73 (95 % confidence interval 1.17–2.55) and 2.33 (95 % confidence interval 1.17–4.63), respectively. Conclusion/interpretation. There was a higher cardiovascular mortality in Type II diabetic patients taking sulphonylurea and metformin in combination than in those taking only sulphonylurea. Hence, it cannot be excluded that this kind of combination therapy possibly increases cardiovascular mortality. It is feasible that the increased mortality was secondary to a more aggressive type of diabetes in the patients using sulphonylurea and metformin in combination. Combination therapy is known to promote additional blood glucose reduction but there is as yet no evidence that a sulphonylurea and metformin combination is more beneficial on micro- or macrovascular disease than sulphonylurea or metformin alone. [Diabetologia (2000) 43: 558–560]
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 41 (1991), S. 263-265 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Metformin ; Glibenclamide ; NIDDM ; lipoproteins ; C-peptide ; diabetes mellitus ; adverse effects ; serum lipids
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary. Twenty-two NIDDM patients completed an open randomized cross-over study comparing metformin and glibenclamide over 1 year. The drugs had an equivalent effect on glycaemic control, but, in contrast to glibenclamide, metformin reduced body weight. Neither drug affected triglycerides, total-and LDL-cholesterol or C-peptide. Metformin caused a slight elevation of HDL-cholesterol (P 〈 0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed. The results show that oral hypoglycaemic agents are not associated with undesirable effects on lipids and lipoproteins.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...