Bibliothek

Notizen: Summary The systemic disposition of theophylline after taking a new, sustained release tablet (Theolair Retard® 250 mg, Theolair S. R.®, Riker Laboratories) has been studied in 8 hospitalized patients. Absolute bioavailability was determined from the ratios of the areas under the serum concentration-time curves after intake of the tablet and after intravenous infusion of aminophylline in the same patient. The absolute bioavailability of Theolair Retard® 250 mg was 110.9±20.8% (mean ± SD). Maximal serum concentrations were reached after 7.3±3.5 h, the large intersubject variation being due to differences in gastric emptying time. The tablets appear to release theophylline slowly in acid conditions, but more rapidly in an alkaline medium. Invasion was found to be either monophasic with a rate constant of about 0.8 h−1 (intestine), or biphasic with rate constants of 0.2 h−1 (stomach) and 0.8 h−1 (intestine). The peak levels accounted for 7.9±2.2 mg · 1−1. The profiles of the serum concentration-time curves were such that the concentrations remained above 80% of cmax for 6.5±3.3 h. The relevant pharmacokinetic parameters (half-life of elimination, total body clearance and volume of distribution) were determined and were used to calculate the individual dosage regimens required to obtain therapeutic serum concentrations. The optimal dosing interval to obtain an average steady state serum concentration of 12.5 mg · l−1 was 9.8±3.1 h.

Notizen: Summary The bioavailability of theophylline after oral administration of a new sustained release tablet Theograd®-250 mg was studied in 7 healthy volunteers, under fasting and non-fasting conditions. Whilst fasting the bioavailability was moderate at 64±22% (mean±SD), whereas in the non-fasting state the relatively high bioavailability of 90±13% was found. The drug appeared to be significantly more slowly absorbed when a tablet was taken after a meal, than when it was ingested on an empty stomach. In the former case, the peak level was reached after 6.9±1.0 h, whereas in the fasting state the maximum serum concentration occurred 4.0±1.7 h after administration of the drug. Despite the slow absorption, the peak non-fasting level of 4.4±1.4 mg·l−1 was significantly higher than the 3.1±1.0 mg·l−1 observed in the fasting state. The profiles of the serum concentration-time curves showed that the concentration remained above 75% of Cmax for 8.7±1.3 h in the fasting and 9.0±1.1 h in the non-fasting state. It was concluded that to define the optimal dosage regime for sustained release oral dosage forms of theophylline, the influence of food on absorption from these preparations should be taken into account. Based on the present results, Theograd®-250 mg tablets have predictable absorption and a high (90%) bioavailability if taken after a meal.

Notizen: Summary The effect of food on the rate and extent of absorption of theophylline was studied in healthy adults given a single dose of theophylline (aqueous solution of choline theophyllinate containing 270 mg of theophylline) in the evening either on an empty stomach or together with supper. Food appeared to decrease the absorption rate of theophylline significantly, tmax being prolonged from 1.34 h (mean) to 4.40 h and cmax decreased from 7.82 mg·l−1 to 5.47 mg·l−1. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) after drug intake with supper was slightly but not significantly smaller, indicating that theophylline (as a solution of choline theophyllinate) can be taken together with food without substantial loss of the quantity of drug absorbed. The elimination rate was not influenced by concomitant intake of supper.

Notizen: Summary Variation in the systemic disposition of theophylline after ingestion of a new microcrystalline product (Theolair®) has been investigated in 7 hospitalized patients with generalized obstructive lung disease. Disposition (absolute bioavailability) was determined by comparing in the same patients the areas under the serum concentration-time curves after a single oral dose of microcrystalline theophylline and after an intravenous infusion of aminophylline. Oral absorption appeared to be fast. The half-life of absorption was 19±9 min (mean±SD). Maximal serum concentrations reached after 100±30 min were found to be in a rather narrow range: 9.8±2.5 mg · 1−1. The absolute bioavailability of the microcrystalline preparation was high and it showed only small variation: 102.7±10.2% of the dose. Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters (half-life of elimination, volume of distribution and total body clearance) were determined after both routes of administration. Individual dosage regimens required to obtain a therapeutic serum concentration were calculated for each individual patient on the basis of the observed pharmacokinetic parameters.

Notizen: Abstract The indirect effect of diet on the single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of sustained-release ketoprofen was studied in 16 healthy male volunteers. In an open, cross-over design, 200 mg ketoprofen was administered as a gastric-juice-resistant, sustained-release tablet once daily during two periods of 5 days. A low-calorie/low-fat diet (LCFD) was given in the first period and a high-calorie/high-fat diet (HCFD) in the second period. The first meal on each day was given 4 h after drug intake. Ketoprofen plasma concentrations were measured over 24 h after the first dose on day 1 and over 36 h after the final dose on day 5 of each period. On average, plasma concentrations of ketoprofen were higher with the LCFD than with the HCFD. With the HCFD there was a tendency to longer absorption-lag times on day 5. The maximum concentration and the area under the curve over one 24-h dosage period (AUC0–24) were significantly higher with the LCFD, both on day 1 and on day 5. For AUC0–24 the differences were on average 15% (day 1) and 24% (day 5). The same tendency was observed for the amount excreted in urine over 24 h (Ae), but the difference was only significant on day 1 (14%). The elimination rate constant (Kβ) and the mean residence time were similar for the two diets, both on day 1 and on day 5. From these results, we conclude that there was an acute indirect effect of diet when a meal was had 4 h after intake of the medication. This resulted in a greater extent of ketoprofen absorption with the LCFD than with the HCFD. The absorption rate was apparently not influenced by this acute effect. The longer gastric residence time of ketoprofen with the HCFD may be the result of a long-term indirect effect on gastric emptying rate. If the extreme difference between the diets in this study is taken into account, it seems unlikely that the observed indirect effects have implications for clinical practice.

Notizen: Abstract The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) were studied after a single subcutaneous dose given by jet-injection, and have been compared with the results obtained after conventional needle-injection. Twelve healthy male volunteers completed an open label, randomised, two-way crossover study, with a 7-day washout period between the two single sc doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from rhGH concentrations in blood samples collected regularly over 24 h after dosing on Day 1 of each period. To investigate the pharmacodynamics, additional samples were taken for the analysis of somatomedin C (IGF-I) and free fatty acids (FFA). A higher and earlier Cmax was found after jet-injection (ratio (%) jet-injected/needle-injected 124; 90%-confidence interval 108 – 142). The AUC0−∞ for rhGH were similar (ratio (%) jet-injected/needle-injected 98; 90%-confidence interval 93 – 103). Both treatments were associated with a significant and similar rise in IGF-I. Both administrations of rhGH were associated with identical rhythmical changes in FFA. The study indicates that jet-injected and needle-injected rhGH are bioequivalent with respect to the amount absorbed. The criterion for bioequivalence is not met for the rate of absorption. It is unlikely that the latter finding will influence the pharmacodynamics of rhGH, since bioequipotency was established for the effect on IGF-I generation. Jet-injection was safe in use and was generally well tolerated.

Notizen: Summary In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experiment in 21 healthy male volunteers, aged 19 to 27 y, the pharmacokinetics and tolerance of the new anxiolytic drug alpidem (SL80.0342) and its three major metabolites were studied after single doses of 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg. Plasma concentrations of alpidem (in 20 subjects) and metabolites (in 6 subjects) were measured by HPLC over a period of 54 h after dosing. Cmax, tmax and AUC(0–54) and, when possible, t1/2 were determined for alpidem and metabolites and the dose linearity of the parameters was investigated. The time to peak of alpidem was dose independent in most subjects and was short (1–4 h); the mean values at the four dosing levels were 1.9, 1.7, 1.6 and 1.8 h. The peak concentration increased with the dose, the mean values being 17, 34, 88 and 115 ng · ml−1, respectively. In 50% of the subjects cmax tended to stabilize between the 100 and 200 mg dose. Dose linearity was also present for the AUC, which plateaued between the 100 and 200 mg dose in only 3 out of 20 subjects; the mean AUC was 119, 281, 669 and 1117 ng · ml−1 · h, respectively. The apparent half-life of elimination appeared to be dose independent, mean values at the increasing dosing levels being 18.7, 19.9, 18,1 and 17.9 h. A similar relationship between the kinetics parameters and dose of the alpidem was observed for the metabolites SL83.0912, SL80.0522 and SL83.0725. The formation of metabolites was not saturated as their AUCs relative to corresponding alpidem AUCs were not dose related. Thus the kinetics of alpidem and its three major metabolites were linear after doses of 25 to 200 mg. The drug was well tolerated by most of the subjects. Sedation and dizziness occurred mainly after the 100 and 200 mg doses.

Notizen: Abstract Objective: To assess the possibility of any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between tiagabine, a novel antiepileptic drug, and digoxin. Methods: Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between tiagabine and digoxin were investigated in an open-label, two-period cross-over study in healthy male volunteers. Thirteen volunteers, aged between 18 and 43 years, were randomised to receive digoxin (0.5 mg twice a day for 1 day, then 0.25 mg once a day for 8 days) either alone or co-administered with tiagabine (4 mg three times daily for 9 days). Following a 7-day wash-out period, volunteers crossed over to the other dosing regimen. Peak serum concentration, time to maximum serum concentration, area under the serum concentration–time curve from zero to 24 h and steady state serum concentration were calculated for digoxin and compared between treatment groups. Results: No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for any of the derived digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. The most common adverse events reported during digoxin alone and in combination with tiagabine were somnolence and headache; an overall greater frequency of adverse events was reported during combined treatment. Adverse events were generally mild in nature; no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: At the doses administered, there is no evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and tiagabine in healthy male volunteers.

Notizen: Abstract Objectives: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the bisphosphonate tiludronic acid, administered once daily as sodium tiludronate 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg for 12 days. Four groups of ten subjects participated in the study, with a drug to placebo ratio of 4:1. Methods: Pre-dose blood samples were taken on alternate days, starting on Day 1 and additional samples were collected over 144 h following the final dose on Day 12. Urine was collected over 24 h after the final dose. Indices of calcium homeostasis and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed during the study as pharmacodynamic parameters. Tolerability was evaluated with special emphasis on renal function and gastrointestinal irritation. Adverse experiences were assessed at regular time intervals. Results and conclusions: Steady state was attained from Day 4 (200 mg) or from Day 6 (400, 600 and 800 mg). Following the final dose on Day 12, minimal plasma concentrations (Cmin) ranged between 0.19 and 1.5 mg ⋅ l−1, and maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax) between 1.1 and 7.8 mg⋅l−1 for the lowest and highest doses, respectively. A supra-proportional increase in Cmax, AUC24 and Ae 24 with dose was observed. There was a linear relationship between the plasma tiludronic acid and its urinary excretion rate, so, the disproportional rise in Cmax and AUC24 with increasing dose could not be attributed to saturation of renal excretion. Certain indices of calcium homeostasis changed significantly during the study, but generally, became only prominent at the highest dose level of 800 mg. Total serum calcium and the urinary calcium/creatinine clearance ratio fell, indicating depression of osteoclastic bone resorption, which was not revealed by serum osteocalcin levels probably because of the brevity of the treatment (12 days). In response to the decline in serum calcium, serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and intact PTH (1–84) levels increased. None of the safety parameters raised any concerns about the safety of sodium tiludronate administered in this way.

Notizen: Abstract We have studied the controlled-release properties and relative systemic availabilities of two dosages of the same controlled-release (CR) diltiazem tablet formulation by comparing them at steady state with those of an immediate-release formulation. We measured 24-hour plasma concentration profiles during 4-day treatments with diltiazem 90 mg CR tablet bd diltiazem 120 mg CR tablet bd, and conventional diltiazem 60 mg immediate-release (IR) tablet tid. The study had a randomized, three-way crossover design. Twelve healthy men (38–52 y) participated. Trough plasma concentrations were determined on days 3 and 4. The 24-h plasma concentration-time profiles were assessed after the last morning dose on day 4 of each period. The following steady-state pharmacokinetic values were calculated: the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the time interval during which the plasma concentration exceeded 75% of Cmax (t75), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC72–96), the peak-to-trough fluctuation (PTF), and the area-under-the-curve fluctuation (AUCF). Steady state was achieved on day 3. The pharmacokinetics were comparable. For diltiazem CR 90 mg and diltiazem CR 120 mg, AUC84–96 (night) was approximately 75% of AUC72–84 (daytime). The diltiazem plasma concentration increased slowly from about 6 h after the evening dose of both CR tablets, resulting in relatively high plasma concentrations in the early morning hours. Only during treatment with diltiazem CR 120 mg were the plasma concentrations of diltiazem maintained above the minimum therapeutic plasma concentration of 50 μg·1−1 throughout the full 24 h. In conclusion, twice-daily treatment with diltiazem CR tablets can replace thrice-daily treatment with the conventional diltiazem IR tablet. The early morning rise of the diltiazem plasma concentration, which might lead to a lower incidence of ischaemic events, may be an important clinical advantage of both CR tablets. Because of the minimum therapeutic plasma concentration of 50 μg·1−1, twice-daily administration of the 120 mg CR tablet may be preferred from a therapeutic point of view. Diltiazem, a benzothiazepine, is a calcium antagonist used in the treatment of angina pectoris and hypertension. The anti-ischaemic mechanism of diltiazem seems to result from an increase of myocardial oxygen supply and a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand, respectively by coronary artery dilatation and/or direct and indirect haemodynamic effects, such as afterload reduction and heart rate decrease (Braunwald 1982). Its therapeutic effect is evident at daily dosages between 180 and 360 mg (Low et al. 1981). After oral administration it is almost completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, but owing to extensive first-pass metabolism, its systemic availability is approximately 40–50% (Echizen and Eichelbaum 1986). The time to maximum plasma concentrations after oral administration of immediate-release formulations is approximately 3 to 4 h. The elimination half-life of diltiazem is 3.5–7 h, implying that frequent dosing is required to maintain effective plasma concentrations. Therefore, a controlled-release formulation of diltiazem, designed to be taken twice daily, has been developed. The aim of this crossover study was to compare the systemic availability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release diltiazem tablet formulation (90 and 120 mg) with those of a conventional diltiazem immediate-release tablet in healthy volunteers.