Library

Notes: Abstract Previously, the authors proposed a model of neural network extracting binocular parallax (Hirai and Fukushima, 1975). It is a multilayered network whose final layers consist of neural elements corresponding to “binocular depth neurons” found in monkey's visual cortex. The binocular depth neuron is selectively sensitive to a binocular stimulus with a specific amount of binocular parallax and does not respond to a monocular one. As described in the last chapter of the previous article (Hirai and Fukushima, 1975), when a binocular pair of input patterns consist of, for example, many vertical bars placed very closely to each other, the binocular depth neurons might respond not only to correct binocular pairs, but also to incorrect ones. Our present study is concentrated upon how the visual system finds correct binocular pairs or binocular correspondence. It is assumed that some neural network is cascaded after the binocular depth neurons and finds out correct binocular correspondence by eliminating the incorrect binocular pairs. In this article a model of such neural network is proposed. The performance of the model has been simulated on a digital computer. The results of the computer simulation show that this model finds binocular correspondence satisfactorily. It has been demonstrated by the computer simulation that this model also explains the mechanism of the hysteresis in the binocular depth perception reported by Fender and Julesz (1967)

Notes: Summary Neurons that project to the spinal cord were located in the mesencephalic reticular formation outside the interstitial nucleus of Cajal in cerebellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. Of these neurons 40% responded only at C1 (reticulospinal N cells) and the remaining 60% responded at C4 also (reticulospinal D cells). Conduction velocities of N cells were significantly slower than those of D cells. N cells and D cells responded similarly to stimulation of the whole vestibular nerves and vestibular nuclei. However, they differ in semicircular canal inputs; N cells were more responsive to canal stimulation. Comparison of properties between mesencephalic reticulospinal and interstitiospinal neurons (Fukushima et al. 1980) showed that many reticulospinal and interstitiospinal neurons have similar properties, suggesting that functionally similar neurons may be found distributed over more than one anatomically defined cell group.

Notes: Summary Responses of motoneurons supplying muscles of the forelimbs, hindlimbs, back, and neck to stimulation of the medial pontomedullary reticular formation were studied with intracellular recording in cere-bellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. Stimulation of the midline or of a reticular region consisting of nucleus reticularis (n.r.) pontis caudalis and the dorsorostral part of n.r. gigantocellularis produced monosynaptic excitation of ipsilateral motoneurons supplying axial muscles and flexor and extensor muscles in both proximal and distal parts of the limbs. This widespread excitation appears to have been produced by rapidly conducting medial reticulospinal fibers. Stimulation of a second region consisting of n.r. ventralis and the ventrocaudal part of n. r. gigantocellularis produced monosynaptic excitation of ipsilateral neck and back motoneurons but only longer latency, apparently multisynaptic excitation of limb motoneurons. Collision tests indicated that this monosynaptic excitation did not involve fibers descending along the midline. It therefore appears to have been produced by lateral reticulospinal fibers. Reticular stimulation also produced short latency, monosynaptic inhibition of neck motoneurons, long latency, apparently polysynaptic inhibition of limb motoneurons and intermediate latency inhibition of back motoneurons. The latencies and properties of inhibitory responses of back motoneurons indicated that they were produced either disynaptically by fast fibers or monosynaptically by slower fibers. The data indicate that the medial pontomedullary reticular formation can be divided into a number of different zones each with a distinct pattern of connections with somatic motoneurons. These include the dorsorostrally located medial reticulospinal projection area, from which direct excitation of a wide variety of motoneurons can be evoked, the ventrocaudally located lateral reticulospinal projection area from which direct excitation of neck and back and direct inhibition of neck motoneurons can be evoked and the dorsal strip of n.r. gigantocellularis which has direct excitatory and inhibitory actions only on neck motoneurons.

Notes: Summary Interstitiospinal neurons were activated by antidromic stimulation of the spinal cord ventromedial funiculus at C1 and C4 in cerebellectomized cats under chlor alose anesthesia. Neurons responding only to C1 were classified as N cells and those responding both to C1 and C4 were classified as D cells, as in previous experiments (Fukushima et al. 1980a). Vestibular branching interstitiospinal and reticulospinal neurons were also identified as in the previous experiments. Stimulation of the ipsilateral pericruciate cortex evoked firing in 31% of N cells, 41% of D cells and 35% of vestibular branching neurons, while stimulation of the contralateral cortex excited 6% of N cells, 29% of D cells and 14% of vestibular branching neurons. Response latencies ranged from 2 to 15 ms after the effective pulse. By measuring the thresholds of activation of these neurons while changing the depth of the stimulating electrodes, and by mapping the cortical areas, it was shown that the lowest threshold areas were in the frontal eye fields and the anterior sigmoid gyrus near the presylvian sulcus (Area 6). Stimulation of the latter area often evoked neck or shoulder muscle contraction. Stimulation in the deep layers of the ipsilateral superior colliculus evoked firing in about 20% of interstitiospinal neurons and about 42% of vestibular branching neurons, with typical latencies 2–3 ms after the effective pulse, while stimulation of the contralateral superior colliculus was rarely effective. N cells and D cells responded similarly. Thresholds for activation were high in the intermediate tectal layers and declined as the electrodes entered the underlying tegmentum. This suggests that the superior colliculus is not the main source of synaptic inputs to these neurons. Low threshold points were found above the deep fiber layer when stimulating electrodes were inserted into the pretectum. Stimulation of the C2 biventer cervicis nerve excited about 8% of N cells, 18% of D cells, and 15% of vestibular branching neurons bilaterally with typical latencies around 10 ms. Similar results were obtained when C2 splenius nerves were stimulated. The fibers responsible for such excitation are probably group II, since stimuli stronger than 1.8 times threshold of the lowest threshold fibers were needed to evoke excitation. Response decrement was often observed when stimuli were repeated at 1/s, while no such decrement was observed at the rate of 1/3 s. When the convergence of cortical and labyrinthine excitatory inputs was studied, 36% of interstitiospinal neurons received single inputs either from the pericruciate cortex or from the labyrinth, 22% of neurons received convergent excitation from both and the remaining 42% did not respond to either stimulus. Although vestibular branching neurons rarely received labyrinthine inputs, they frequently showed convergence of excitation to stimulation of the frontal cortex, superior colliculus and vestibular nuclei.

Notes: Summary 1. Interstitiospinal neurons were activated by antidromic stimulation of the ventromedial funiculus of the spinal cord at C1 and C4 in cerebellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. 46% of these neurons responded only at C1 (N cells) and the remaining 54% responded at C4 also (D cells). There is no topographical difference in the location of N and D cells. Conduction velocities of N cells were significantly slower than those of D cells. 2. Stimulation of the contralateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of 31% of both N and D cells; some responded early enough to suggest disynaptic connections, many responded late. Stimulation of the ipsilateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of several cells, one spontaneously discharging D cell was inhibited. 3. Stimulation of the contralateral individual semicircular canal nerves evoked firing of 33% of N cells and 13% of D cells. Most of these responses were late. N cells responded not only to the vertical canals but also to the horizontal canal, whereas D cells responded to the horizontal canal, but seldom to the vertical ones. Most canal responding neurons received specific input, only two N cells received convergent input from both the anterior and horizontal canals. Stimulation of the ipsilateral canals did not evoke excitation of any cells tested; one D cell was inhibited by stimulation of the horizontal canal nerve. 4. Stimulation of the rostral medial vestibular nucleus evoked characteristic negative field potentials centered in the contralateral interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC). Approximately 60% of both N and D cells received excitation from the contralateral vestibular nuclei. About 17% of these responding neurons received monosynaptic excitation, most frequently from the rostral medial nucleus. Stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei evoked firing of 12% of both N and D cells. 5. Twenty-nine neurons were fired antidromically by weak stimuli applied to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Twenty-seven of the 29 were activated only from C1 and were found in the INC (10 cells) and in the reticular formation dorsal to the INC (19 cells). Measurement of the spread of the effect of stimulus current and comparison of latencies to stimulation of the vestibular nuclei and C1 indicated that these neurons have axon collaterals going to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Only one of them received excitation from the contralateral posterior canal, others did not respond to the labyrinth. Some were activated by stimulation of the vestibular nuclei.

Notes: Summary (1) Spikes of neurons in the medial and descending vestibular nuclei were recorded extracellularly and their responses to stimulation of the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) were studied in cerebellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. Stimuli applied in the ipsilateral INC excited 37% of neurons that did not exhibit spontaneous activity. About 84% of spontaneously discharging neurons were influenced by the INC; typical responses were excitation (35%), inhibition (22%) and excitation followed by inhibition (27%). Of the neurons that were excited, 24% fired monosynaptically. Such monosynaptic activation was evoked by stimulating the INC and midbrain medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF), but was not evoked by stimulating the lateral midbrain reticular formation. Polysynaptic excitation or inhibition was evoked more widely, but the lowest threshold points were within the INC. Stimulation of the contralateral INC also evoked polysynaptic excitation or inhibition. However, the frequency of occurrence of the evoked responses was significantly smaller compared to the ipsilateral responses. (2) Intracellular recordings revealed that some medial and lateral vestibular neurons received monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), others received polysynaptic EPSPs or inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) from the ipsilateral INC. The minimum latency for the IPSPs suggests that the pathway is at least disynaptic. No significant collision was observed between monosynaptic EPSPs evoked by the ipsilateral INC and contralateral vestibular nuclei. Acute lesions that damaged the pontine MLF and part of the reticular formation did not abolish monosynaptic responses of vestibular neurons by the INC. Depth threshold curves for mono- or polysynaptic responses drawn before and after the lesions were virtually similar. Antidromic thresholds of interstitio-vestibular fibers evoked from the pontine MLF showed that a great majority of these fibers run outside the MLF at the pontine level. These results control for vestibular axon reflexes, since vestibulo-interstitial fibers ascend within the MLF (cf. Gacek 1971). (3) Responses to stimulation of the INC were not different among different types of canal responding neurons; vertical and horizontal canal responding neurons received similar effects. However, canal responding neurons that received excitation from the contralateral vestibular nerve were activated more frequently by the INC than those that received inhibition (χ2 test, p〈0.01). Qualitatively similar results were obtained from vestibular neurons that had different projection sites; vestibulospinal, contralateral INC-projecting and contralateral vestibular nuclei-projecting neurons received similar effects. (4) Vestibulo-collic reflexes, studied with EMG, were modified by preceding INC stimulation. Intracellular recordings from some neck motoneurons showed that disynaptic EPSPs evoked by stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve were modified by preceding INC stimulation applied ipsilateral to the stimulated vestibular nerve. INC stimulation alone did not evoke any response in these motoneurons, suggesting that the interaction of the labyrinthine and interstitial effects occurred at least in part at the vestibular nuclei. (5) Some medial and descending vestibular neurons showed multiple branching, projecting to the contralateral INC, C1 or contralateral vestibular nuclei. About 34% of neurons that projected to the contralateral INC were also antidromically activated from the C1; some of them received vertical canal inputs.

Notes: Summary To study the neural basis for the regulation of vestibulocollic reflexes during voluntary head movements, the effects of stimulation of the precruciate cortex near the presylvian sulcus (neck area of the motor cortex) and the frontal eye fields (FEF) on vestibular neurons were studied in cerebellectomized cats anesthetized with α chloralose. Neurons were recorded in the medial and descending vestibular nuclei and antidromically identified from C1. Stimulation of the FEF and precruciate cortex fired 29 and 13% of neurons that did not exhibit spontaneous activity. About 80% of spontaneously discharging neurons were influenced by stimulation of either of the two. Stimulation of the precruciate cortex or FEF suppressed or facilitated labyrinthine evoked monosynaptic activation of vestibulospinal neurons, suggesting that the frontal cortical neurons have the properties to regulate the vestibulocollic reflexes.

Notes: Summary 1. Experiments were performed in cats to determine whether the head tilt following a unilateral lesion of the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) can be attributed to removal of interstitiospihal fibers which have direct excitatory synaptic connections with ipsilateral neck extensor (biventer cervicis-complexus) and flexor (sternocleidomastoid, SCM) motoneurons. Unilateral INC lesions were made either electrolytically or reversibly by procaine infusion into the INC, and electromyographic activity was recorded bilaterally from biventer (BIV), splenius (SP) and SCM muscles. In both groups of lesions, activity of the ipsilateral SP and BIV was higher than that of the contralateral ones. When procaine was infused into the INC of awake cats, an increase of activity of the ipsilateral SP began before the cats presented the typical head tilt to the opposite side. Bilateral INC lesions caused dorsiflexion of the head. These results indicate that the head tilt resulting from unilateral INC lesions can not be explained by simple removal of the ipsilateral, direct excitatory interstitioneck impulses. 2. When unilateral INC lesions were combined with hemilabyrinthectomies, cats that were given labyrinthectomies on the side opposite to the previous INC lesions showed very severe head tilt, whereas cats that received labyrinthectomies on the same side did not show obvious head tilt. Furthermore, it took a much longer time for the cats of the former group to compensate the head tilt than it took those that had single lesions of the INC or labyrinth. These results suggest that the INC and labyrinth interact in the control of head posture and that the INC also plays a role in vestibular compensation. However, when bilatral INC lesions were combined with hemilabyrinthectomies, cats that had previously received bilateral INC lesions and which had fully compensated the head posture recuperated from vestibular symptoms following hemilabyrinthectomy within one to two weeks. Moreover, bilateral INC lesions that were performed in cats which had previously been given hemilabyrinthectomies and in which vestibular symptoms were well compensated did not produce any recurrence of vestibular symptoms. These results indicate that although the INC plays a role in the control of head posture following hemilabyrinthectomy, it is not needed for coarse vestibular compensation.

Notes: Abstract  To examine the effects of smooth-pursuit eye movements on the initiation of saccades, their latency was measured when subjects initially fixated or pursued a target. In half of the block of trials, the fixation or pursuit target was extinguished 200 ms before the saccade target was illuminated (gap trials). Reduction of the mean saccade latency in the gap trials (the “gap effect”) was evident even when the subjects were pursuing a moving target, consistent with previous observations. The effect of pursuit direction on saccade latency was also examined. Saccades in the same direction as the preceding pursuit (forward saccades) had shorter latencies than those in the opposite direction (backward saccades). This asymmetry was observed in both the gap and nongap trials. Although the forward-backward asymmetry was much smaller than the “gap effect”, it was statistically significant in six of eight cases. These results suggest that the preparation of saccades is affected by smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Notes: Summary Attempts were made to study differences in the relative effectiveness of different size ranges of motor axons to Renshaw cells by differential blocking of larger fibers of the gastrocnemius nerve in cats anesthetized with Nembutal. 1. Differential blocking of larger fibers in the nerve was successfully obtained by applying trapezoid wave current to the nerve. 2. It was shown that more than half (58.1%) of the Renshaw cells receive homogeneous inputs from a motor axon collaterals, 25.8% of the cell receive collateral inputs from a certain group of fibers, and 12.5% of the Renshaw cells were activated by “γ range” fibers.