ISSN:
1569-8041
Keywords:
chemotherapy
;
hematopoietic growth-factor support
;
high-dose chemotherapy
;
peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
;
small-cell lung cancer
;
treatment toxicity and mortality
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract Background: We conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the feasibilityand activity of VIP-E chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. End-points weretreatment-related morbidity and mortality, response to treatment, duration ofresponse, and survival. Patients and methods: Two cycles of combination chemotherapy followedby granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were given at a dose ofetoposide (500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4000mg/m2), cisplatin (50 mg/m2), and epirubicin(50 mg/m2) to 100 consecutive patients with SCLC. Thirtypatients (19 with LD, and 11 with ED SCLC) proceeded to VIC-E high-dosechemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation(PBSCT) at a cumulative dose of etoposide 1500 mg/m2,ifosfamide 12,000 mg/m2, carboplatin 750 mg/m2and epirubicin 150 mg/m2 (VIC-E). Surgical resection ofprimary tumor was attempted at the earliest feasible point. Thoracicirradiation was given after completion of chemotherapy. Results of conventional-dose VIP-E: 97 patients were evaluable forresponse. Objective response rate was 81% in LD-SCLC (33% CR,48% PR; excluding patients in surgical CR) and 77% in ED-SCLC(18% CR, 58% PR). Treatment mortality was 2%. Mediansurvival was 19 months in LD-SCLC and 6 months in ED-SCLC. Two-year survivalwas 36% in LD and 0% in ED SCLC. Results of high-dose VIC-E: All 30 patients improved on or maintainedprior responses. Four patients (13%) died of treatment-relatedcomplications. Median survival was 26 months in LD-SCLC and 8 months inED-SCLC. Two-year survival was 53% in LD and 9% in ED SCLC. Conclusion: VIP-E chemotherapy is an effective induction therapy forSCLC. Compared with traditional protocols such as ACO orcarboplatin/etoposide, response rates are slightly improved, while survivalis not different. In the LD SCLC subgroup, high-dose chemotherapy improvedresponse rates and survival, especially for patients in surgical CR prior tohigh-dose therapy. In ED SCLC, however, higher response-rates did nottranslate into improved survival. Selected LD-SCLC patients with good partialor complete remissions after prior therapy may benefit from HDC and PBSCT.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008232329498
