Library

Notes: Background SDZ ASM 981 is a selective inhibitor of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from T cells and mast cells in vitro. It is the first ascomycin macrolactam derivative under development for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Objectives This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0·05%, 0·2%, 0·6% and 1·0% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and to select the concentration to be used in phase III studies. Methods This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre dose-finding study. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0·05%, 0·2%, 0·6%, or 1·0%, matching vehicle cream, or the internal control 0·1% betamethasone-17-valerate cream (BMV). Treatment was given twice daily for up to 3 weeks. Results A clear dose–response relationship for SDZ ASM 981 was evident, with 0·2%, 0·6% and 1·0% SDZ ASM 981 creams all being significantly more effective than vehicle (P = 0·041, 0·001 and 0·008, respectively) in terms of baseline to end-point changes in the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) and pruritus score. The 1·0% cream was the most effective SDZ ASM 981 concentration. BMV was more effective than the SDZ ASM 981 creams tested in this study. It appears that the efficacy plateau was not reached with the SDZ ASM 981 creams within 3 weeks treatment. SDZ ASM 981 was well tolerated. Burning or a feeling of warmth were the only adverse events reported more frequently in the 0·6% and 1·0% SDZ ASM 981 treatment groups than in the vehicle treatment group (42·9%, 48·9% and 34·9%, respectively). Few systemic adverse events were reported during the study (headache was the most frequent systemic event reported by 15 of 252 patients) and none was considered to be related to treatment. The local tolerability profile of the 1·0% cream was similar to that of the lower concentrations. Conclusions 1·0% SDZ ASM 981 cream, which was shown to be safe, well tolerated and the most effective concentration in this study, was selected as the concentration to be further developed in phase III studies.

Notes: For more than five decades, topical corticosteroids and emollients have been the mainstay of therapy for atopic dermatitis. However, the potential for side-effects limits the clinical utility of corticosteroids in providing long-term disease control. With a unique mode of action that differs from that of corticosteroids, the steroid-free topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, provide skin-selective treatment that targets key factors involved in the pathogenesis of this chronic disease. An extensive series of clinical trials involving more than 16 000 patients with predominately moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in tacrolimus studies and over 2000 patients with primarily mild to moderate disease in pimecrolimus studies has shown that both TCIs provide effective and well-tolerated treatment for atopic dermatitis. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that tacrolimus is superior to conventional hydrocortisone-based regimens and does not cause skin atrophy or other steroidal side-effects. Both tacrolimus and pimecrolimus prevent disease flares and provide progressive and sustained disease improvement with long-term therapy. These and other clinical benefits of TCIs are discussed, together with the safety profiles of tacrolimus and pimecrolimus and their use in clinical practice. In addition, this review summarizes findings from the many trials carried out with these agents and outlines how TCIs can provide long-term treatment and control of a chronic skin disease that may persist for years.

Notes: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is today the most common, chronic inflammatory skin disease among children in developed countries. Its cumulative prevalence varies from 20% in northern Europe and the USA to approximately 5% in Mediterranean countries. As a chronic disease it puts a special demand on treatment. There is no curative therapy, but competent guidance on treatment principles can control the disease in most, if not all children. This article summarizes the evidence-based knowledge that relates to the treatment of atopic eczema. It also gives advice and opinions on prophylactic measures as these are the focus of interest from most parents.〈section xml:id="abs1-2"〉〈title type="main"〉Learning objectiveThis article should enable you to give advice and guidance to parents of children with AD, including what is necessary for diagnosis, what is of value and importance considering allergies and allergological investigations, allergen exposure, prophylactic measures, diets and indoor environment. Finally, you should be able to explain the diversity of treatment principles for parents.

Notes: Atopic dermatitis (AD), or atopic eczema, is the most common, chronic inflammatory disease among children in industrialized countries. We still lack knowledge of its pathophysiology and in particular the role of allergy as both an eliciting factor for disease expression and for disease activity. This article describes the clinical symptoms of the disease and its qualitatively different aspects. AD cannot be understood as being induced by one factor only, e.g. allergy, and this is important when planning treatment strategies. It is also important to realize the very wide range of disease intensity: from subclinical, or latent AD, in which only a few symptoms are present and thus which prevents a clear diagnosis of AD, to its most severe forms including erythroderma. It's unknown aetiology, the wide range in symptomatology, and the fluctuating course (including the many eliciting factors) form the background for our diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties of atopic eczema. AD is prevalent in childhood, but the atopic trait continues, not only for later respiratory allergies, but also for skin diseases in adulthood (such as AD itself or the frequent irritant contact dermatitis of the hands). A child with an acute and first attack of AD is therefore a challenge to the child, its parents and – certainly − to the doctor. However, after stressing the chronicity of the disease, it is equally important to assure the parents that this disease is, in most cases, controllable through correct treatment and that it has a good prognosis: It is not a ‘life sentence’, but a controllable disease in an otherwise healthy child.

Notes: Background Liarozole is an inhibitor of the metabolism of all-trans-retinoic acid. Systemic administration increases tissue levels of this endogenous retinoid and has been reported to improve psoriasis in an open, uncontrolled study. Objectives A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was therefore undertaken to determine the lowest effective oral dose of liarozole in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. Patients/methods Adult male and postmenopausal female patients requiring systemic treatment for psoriasis were randomized to receive placebo or liarozole at total daily doses of 50 mg, 75 mg or 150 mg for 12 weeks. The daily doses were each divided into two equal (morning and evening) doses. Response was assessed using an eight-point global scale to assess improvement and by monitoring the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The primary end-point was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group demonstrating ‘marked improvement’ or better as assessed on the eight-point scale. The tolerability of the treatment was assessed by recording mucocutaneous effects of retinoids and all adverse events. Biochemical and haematological monitoring were also performed. Results One hundred and thirty-nine subjects were randomized (118 male and 21 female) and 116 completed the study. A marked improvement or better response was observed in 6% of subjects on placebo, 18% on liarozole 50 mg, 11% on 75 mg and 38% on 150 mg. Only in the 150-mg group was the response rate significantly different to placebo (P 〈 0·001). Over the treatment period the mean PASI changed from 15·9 to 15·4 on placebo, from 17·4 to 13·8 on liarozole 50 mg, from 17·5 to 14·5 on 75 mg and from 15·8 to 8·8 on 150 mg. Again, only in the group receiving 150 mg was the response significantly better than placebo (P 〈 0·001). Liarozole was generally well tolerated. Mucocutaneous retinoid effects were generally infrequent and mild. Five subjects were withdrawn from treatment as a result of adverse events that may have been treatment related. These events were abnormalities of liver enzymes in two cases, an episode of erythema multiforme (in a patient receiving placebo), an allergic reaction in one and a rash accompanied by deterioration of the psoriasis in another. There was mild elevation of triglycerides in the groups receiving liarozole 75 mg and 150 mg daily. In males, the serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone levels rose significantly in all the active treatment groups. Conclusions The data confirm that liarozole is an effective treatment for psoriasis and indicate that the lowest effective dose is 75 mg twice daily. The drug seems generally to be well tolerated.

Notes: Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease expressed early in life. Disease development is primarily determined by as yet unknown genetic factors, leading to the accumulation of activated T lymphocytes in the skin.Objectives To investigate the nature of these T cells.Methods T-cell lines could be established from AD skin biopsies, but not from normal skin or AD peripheral blood, when placed in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% human AB serum, antibiotics, and the T-lymphocyte growth factors interleukins 2 and 4. The cell lines were subjected to phenotypic analysis using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter and compared with lymphocytes from AD and normal control peripheral blood.Results T-cell lines from 22 of 24 consecutive skin biopsies taken from 24 adult patients with AD were established. All cells were T lymphocytes expressing several activation markers. A significant proportion of the lymphocytes had stable expression of a CD4+ CD8+ phenotype (26% ± 6%; mean ± SEM). Such double-positive T lymphocytes are normally only seen in the thymus and not in the peripheral immune system. CD4+ CD8+ cells in peripheral blood of the patients (12·5% ± 3·3%) were also detected.Conclusions We suggest that a basic pathophysiological change in AD may be a faulty maturation of the T-lymphocyte system, leading to skin inflammation with CD4+ CD8+ T lymphocytes resembling immature T cells. This is likely to lead to skewing of many immune reactions in the patients.