Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 40 (1991), S. 417-418 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Procaterol ; salbutamol ; bronchial asthma ; side effects ; bronchodilation ; effect duration
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Procaterol is a new, potent, long-acting beta-2-adrenergic bronchodilator. The magnitude and duration of the immediate bronchodilatation produced by inhaled procaterol aerosol have been compared with those produced by inhaled salbutamol aerosol in 20 asthmatic patients. Patients inhaled two puffs of procaterol (20 μg) or two puffs of salbutamol (200 μg) and PEF, FVC and FEV1 were measured after 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min. The changes in mean PEF, FEV1 and FVC values were greater after procaterol than salbutamol, but the difference in bronchodilatation was not significant. The response to rimiterol after 180 min was greater in the salbutamol group. The increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were slightly higher after procaterol. Eleven patients reported adverse effects; 5 after procaterol, 3 after salbutamol, and 3 after both drugs. Thus, procaterol was a potent bronchodilator when inhaled as a single dose of 20 μg, but it did not appear to be an ultra long-acting preparation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 27 (1990), S. 229-233 
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary This phase I study was carried out to determine the maximal tolerated dose of carboplatin (Car) together with a fixed dose of etoposide (E) and to recommend the optimal dose for a phase II study. The dose of E was 100 mg/m2 given i.v. on days 1–3, and the starting dose of Car was 200 mg/m2 given i.v. on day 1. The dose was escalated until WHO grade 4 toxicity developed after two treatment cycles in more than one-third of the patients. A total of 33 patients with advanced lung cancer entered the trial. The maximal tolerated toxicity of the combination was reached at a dose of 500 mg/m2 Car. Myelosuppression was moderate, and hematological toxicity of WHO grade 4 was encountered in one of five patients at 475 mg/m2 and in two out of five patients at 500 mg/m2. The main toxic effects were leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. The frequency of treatment-related infections was low and no deaths were caused by treatment. There was a significant overall correlation between the platelet nadir and creatinine clearance. One complete response and three partial responses were achieved after two treatment cycles. Based on the results of the present study, the dose of carboplatin (combined with 100 mg/m2 eposide given on days 1–3) recommended for phase II studies is 450 mg/m2.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 39 (1996), S. 212-216 
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Multidrug resistance ; Lung cancer ; Antiestrogen ; Toremifene ; Pharmacokinetics study
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  In this pharmacokinetics study, concentrations of toremifene (TOR), a new antiestrogen, were measured after a 7-day oral treatment in serum, lung, and tumor tissue to determine the optimal dose of TOR for the modulation of clinical multidrug resistance in patients with lung cancer. Target levels of the antiestrogen were based on previous in vitro studies. Altogether, 18 patients with operable lung tumors were studied. TOR was given in an open, nonrandomized, phase I study at three different dose levels. The medication consisted of oral TOR given for 7 days at either 240, 480, or 600 mg/day before surgical removal of the tumor. At least five patients were scheduled to be included at each dose level, with all five receiving the full course of therapy before escalation of the dose. Blood samples for serum TOR concentration measurements were taken on days 0 and 7. Specimens of tumor and normal lung tissue of approximately 0.5 g were taken on day 7. The concentrations of TOR and its metabolites were determined in serum, lung, and tumor tissue at different dose levels. Altogether, 12 evaluable patients completed the scheduled treatment. The concentrations measured in serum, lung, and tumor tissue increased along with the dose used, such that the highest TOR values were achieved at 600 mg/day, with mean values being 4.9 μmol/l, 175.0 μmol/g, and 122.7 μmol/g, respectively. The concentrations of TOR and its metabolite N-demethyltoremifene were highest in lung tissue, but the values measured in tumor specimens were also well above the respective concentrations detected in serum samples. The TOR doses of 240 and 480 mg/day were well tolerated. One patient in the group treated at 600 mg/day had to discontinue the treatment because of headache and nausea. TOR given at doses ranging from 480 to 600 mg/day for 7 days will produce serum, lung, and tumor concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolites that have been shown to reverse multidrug resistance of cancer cells in vitro. As the 480-mg/day dose of TOR produced tumor concentrations high enough to reverse multidrug resistance without producing adverse drug reactions, the dose recommended for the foreseen clinical trials in the reversal of multidrug resistance would be 480 mg/day for 7 days.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: cisplatin ; etoposide ; gemcitabine ; non-small-cell lung cancer ; randomised phase II study
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: This randomised study was designed to determine the responserate, survival and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine andcisplatin–etoposide in chemo-naïve patients with locally advancedor metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was given asa 30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria includedhistologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, measurable disease,Zubrod PS 0–2; no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measuredlesion, and no CNS metastases. Results: 146 patients were enrolled, 71 patients on gemcitabine and 75patients on cisplatin–etoposide. Patient characteristics were wellmatched across both arms. Sixty-six gemcitabine patients and 72cisplatin–etoposidepatients were evaluable. Partial responses were seen in 12 gemcitabinepatients (18.2%; 95% CI: 9.8–30) and 11cisplatin–etoposide patients (15.3%; 95% CI:7.9–25.7).Early indications show no statistical differences between the two treatmentswith respect to time to disease progression or survival. Haematological andlaboratory toxicity were moderate and manageable. However, hospitalisationbecause of neutropenic fever was required for 6 (8%)cisplatin–etoposide patients but not for any gemcitabine patients.Non-haematological toxicity was more pronounced with significant differencesin nausea and vomiting (grade 3 and 4: 11% gemcitabine vs. 29%cisplatin–etoposide; despite the allowance for 5-HT-3antiemetics during the first cycle of cisplatin–etoposide), and alopecia(grade 3 and 4: 3% gemcitabine vs. 62%cisplatin–etoposide). Conclusions: In this randomised study, single-agent gemcitabine was atleast as active but better tolerated than the combinationcisplatin–etoposide.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...