Library

Notes: Summary To evaluate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of aHaemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (HbOC) and of a tricomponent acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) when injected simultaneously into either contralateral arms or into contralateral thighs, 110 infants were enrolled to receive three doses of DTaP at 3, 4, and 5 months and two HbOC doses at 3 and 5 months of age. Administration of either of the two vaccines into arms was associated with significantly more local side effects than administration into thighs. There was no difference in geometric mean concentration (GMC) values for any of the four vaccine antigens between subjects who had been vaccinated into arms or thighs. After immunization, all children had protective antibody titers to diphtheria toxin. While post vaccination the mean anti-tetanus toxoid GMC was ≥ 1.25 IU/ml, there was no significant rise as compared to the GMC before vaccination. GMCs of antibodies against the various pertussis antigens were similar to those observed before with the same DTaP vaccine. The simultaneous administration of DTaP and HbOC was safe and immunogenic irrespective of the site of vaccine administration, but significantly more local reactions occurred when vaccines were injected into arms.

Notes: Summary.  Second generation enzyme immunoassays (EIA-2) for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) have a higher specificity and sensitivity than first generation enzyme immunoassays (EIA-1). We studied how many anti-HCV-positive blood donors were missed by the EIA-1, how many were false positive, how false-positive donors should be dealt with and how the results of the EIA-2 correlate to demographic data and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. A total of 208, 544 northern German blood donors, not preselected for anti-HCV negativity, were tested for anti-HCV with EIA-2 and, if repeatably reactive (rr), were retested with a licensed supplementary test (RIBA-2). 0.43% of the donors were EIA-2 rr, but only 0.12% of women and 0.09% of men were RIBA-2 positive. RIBA-2 positivity rates were very low in donors 18 to 27 years old (0.03% and 0.05%) and rose with age in women but not in men. Infected women were significantly more often Rhesus-negative than men. The rate of unspecifically positive EIA-2 results (entirely negative in RIBA-2) increased with age in both sexes and did not correlate with ALT. The ALT distribution was age-dependent with a different pattern for men and women. Confirmation of EIA-2 results with RIBA was rare when ALT was low and frequent when ALT was high. ALT screening before introduction of Anti-HCV detected one out of six infected donors. To exclude this one infectious donation, 46 uninfected donations had to be excluded in addition. Only 8% of the then RIBA-2-positive donors were not detected by EIA-1. Apparent seroconversions in EIA-2 are usually not specific: only 1 out of 66 apparent seroconversions could be confirmed by RIBA-2 suggesting recent HCV infection. 0.15% of the donor population showed an inconsistent EIA-2 pattern during follow-up. We conclude that donors should not be excluded from further donations, even on the basis of multiple EIA-1 positive results or on the basis of only one EIA-2 positive donation. Anti-D-immunoglobulin prophylaxis may have been a source of infection in some Rhesus-negative women. ALT screening should not be discontinued because recent HCV infection can be detected earlier by ALT than by anti-HCV, but exclusion limits should be elevated to increase specificity and limit unnecessary exclusion of donations.