Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Der Anaesthesist 46 (1997), S. 943-948 
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Pneumonie ; nosokomiale Infektion ; Beatmungssystemwechsel ; Key words Pneumonia ; Nosocomial infection ; Exchange of breathing circuits
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract In an investigation of infection control methods for respirator systems in 89 randomly selected German intensive care units as a part of the NIDEP study (Nosocomial Infections in Germany – Surveillance and Prevention), it was found that respirator systems were exchanged daily in about 50% of the intensive care units. However, Craven et al. found that changing circuits (including tubing and exhalation valve and the attached humidifier) every 24 h rather than every 48 h was independently associated with the occurrence of nosocomial pneumonia. On the basis of these results and recent studies, the current situation in the literature was analyzed in order to make recommendations for exchanging ventilator circuits. Methods: Based on the extensive analysis of the literature by the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), we could limit our investigation to the years after 1994. A MEDLINE search was done, and abstracts from congresses of the past few years were considered. The main focus of the analysis was the development of pneumonia and not the contamination of the breathing circuit. The following methodological factors were analyzed for the most important published studies: design, applied definitions of pneumonia, sample size, comparability of study groups, inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of the different studies were compared considering the potential bias factors. Results and discussion: There were nine prospective controlled studies on this topic. In all studies, the authors tried to investigate whether a longer interval between ventilator circuit exchange (more than 48 h) is safe or whether it is possible to leave the circuits unchanged (without using breathing filters). The design and results of the available studies were analyzed. The three most important studies were compared very carefully (Table 1 and 2), and a recommendation for infection control measures for ventilator circuits was made as a modification of the HICPAC guidelines. In addition, the device-associated pneumonia rates of ventilated intensive care patients in the NIDEP study were analyzed separately according to a daily or a 48-h or longer interval of ventilator circuit exchange. For patients with daily exchange, we found a device-associated rate of 17.4 per 1000 ventilator days and for those with longer intervals a rate of 7.9 per 1000 ventilator days. Only considering those patients without heat and moisture filters, the figures were 14.8 versus 6.1. These differences were not significant because of the small number of patients investigated. Conclusion: The available studies show clear advantages of not routinely exchanging the ventilator circuit, including tubing, exhalation valve and the attached humidifier, more often then every 7 days for an individual patient. Based on these findings, the current practice in most German intensive care units should be reevaluated.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Ausgehend von den Ergebnissen einer Erhebung zum Umgang mit Beatmungssystemen in 89 zufällig ausgewählten deutschen Intensivstationen, bei der in fast 50% ein täglicher Wechsel der Beatmungssysteme festgestellt wurde, und den Ergebnissen der Untersuchung von Craven et al. 1986, nach der der tägliche Wechsel ein Risikofaktor für die Entwicklung von Pneumonien ist, wird der aktuelle Stand der Literatur analysiert. Danach existieren inzwischen mindestens drei gut geplante epidemiologische Untersuchungen über das Pneumonierisiko in Abhängigkeit von den Wechselintervallen der Beatmungssysteme. Schlußfolgerung: Die bisherigen Daten in der Literatur reichen nicht aus, um zu belegen, daß durch einen selteneren Beatmungssystemwechsel als alle 48 h die Pneumonierate reduziert wird; auf keinen Fall steigt dadurch das Pneumonierisiko an. Wegen der Einsparung von Arbeitszeit und Material sowie Reduktion des Risikos der Umgebungskontamination beim Systemwechseln kann somit empfohlen werden, die Wechselintervalle auf eine Woche auszudehnen bzw. generell auf den Wechsel der Beatmungssysteme zu verzichten.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Nosokomiale Infektionen ; Intensivstationen ; NIDEP ; Bundesweite Prävalenzstudie ; Key words Nosocomial infections ; Intensive care unit ; NIDEP ; Nationwide prevalence survey
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract In a large, multicenter survey in 1994, the prevalence of nosocomial infections in German hospitals was examined, predominant pathogens were identified, and possible risk factors evaluated. In this paper the results from the intensive care units (ICUs) are presented. Methods. Seventy-two representative hospitals in Germany were selected by randomisation and divided into four different groups according to their size (〈200 beds; 200–400 beds; 400–600 beds; 〉600 beds). During 10 months four especially trained doctors documented the patients clinical and laboratory data and possible endogenous and exogenous risk factors for nosocomial infections. For better evaluation, they discussed the cases with the responsible senior officers and health care workers and visited the patients. Diagnosis of nosocomial infection was based on CDC criteria. Results. In 515 patients in 89 ICUs, 78 hospital-acquired infections were documented (15.3%). The most common were pneumonia (5.9%), bronchitis (2.7%), urinary tract infections (2.4%), and septicaemia (2.2%). Possible exogenous risk factors included: peripheral venous catheters (65.6%); catheterisation of the urinary tract (64.5%); central venous catheters (60.4%); gastric tubes (38.0%); wound drainage (28.6%) and artificial ventilation (27.6%). The most frequent concomitant diseases were cardiovascular (61.9%), diabetes (20.2%), malignancies (18.8%), pre-existing infections (15.3%), and chronic respiratory disease (14.0%). The prevalence of nosocomial infections was higher in hospitals with more than 600 beds than in smaller ones (28.3% versus 12.9%, P〈0.001). Predominant pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp.. Fifty per cent of the ICUs changed ventilation tubes and 66.3% changed infusion sets daily; 34.8% of patients received drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers that neutralise or decrease production of gastric acid; only 7.6% received sucralfate. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done by 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs, respectively. Discussion. Nosocomial infections are seen far more often in ICUs than on normal wards due to the immunosuppressed state of many ICU patients and the continuous use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Most of these infections are of endogenous origin. Other prevalence surveys have shown results comparable to ours. Daily changing of ventilation tubes is no longer necessary, but is still routine in many hospitals. Infusion sets were also changed more often than required. The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract for the prevention of pneumonia is still controversial; in our study it was practised in only 1.5% of the cases. The most commonly used drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers were H2-receptor blocking agents, although it has been shown that sucralfate is the better choice, as it can help prevent nosocomial pneumonia. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done in 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs. No study so far has shown that routine cultures of tracheal secretions and urine have a preventive effect regarding infection.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Im Auftrag des Bundesgesundheitsministeriums wurde von Januar bis Oktober 1994 eine für Deutschland repräsentative Prävalenzstudie mit insgesamt 14966 Patienten an 72 nach Größenklassen ausgewählten Kliniken mit dem Ziel durchgeführt, nosokomiale Infektionen, potentielle Risikofaktoren und Hygienemaßnahmen zu erfassen (NIDEP: Nosokomiale Infektionen in Deutschland – Erfassung und Prävention). Auf 89 Intensivstationen hatten von 515 Patienten 78 (15,3%) mindestens eine nosokomiale Infektion. Die häufigsten Infektionen waren Pneumonie (5,9%), Tracheobronchitis (2,7%), Harnwegsinfektion (2,4%) und primäre Sepsis (2,2%). Die häufigsten potentiellen endogenen Risikofaktoren für Krankenhausinfektionen waren Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen (61,9%), Diabetes mellitus (20,2%), Malignome (18,8%), vorbestehende Infektionen (15,3%) und chronische Atemwegserkrankungen (14,0%). Für die potentiell exogenen Risikofaktoren ergaben sich folgende Prävalenzen: Periphere Venenkatheter (65,6%), Harndrainagen (64,5%), zentrale Venenkatheter (60,4%), Magensonden (38,0%), Wunddrainagen (28,6%), und kontrollierte Beatmung (27,6%). 50,0% der Intensivstationen wechselten die Beatmungsschläuche und 66,3% die Infusionssysteme immer noch täglich. Bei 34,8% der Patienten wurde eine säurehemmende Streßulkusprophylaxe durchgeführt, lediglich 17,6% der Patienten erhielten Sucralfat. Die Mehrzahl der Intensivstationen führte kein routinemäßiges mikrobiologisches Monitoring durch. Einige Intensivstationen untersuchten jedoch Urin und Trachealsekret täglich. Die häufigsten Erreger nosokomialer Infektionen auf Intensivstationen waren in absteigender Reihenfolge Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterokokken, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Intensivmedizin ; Surveillance ; Infektionsraten ; Prävention ; Qualitätsmanagement ; Keywords Intensive care ; Surveillance ; Prevention ; Quality management ; Infection rates
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Objectives. To establish a surveillance system as an element of internal quality management, participating intensive care units (ICUs) report their ICU-associated infection surveillance data for aggregation into a national database. Methods. In order to provide data on ICU-associated infections, a nosocomial surveillance system in German intensive care units (Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System (KISS)) started in 1997. The method of data collection is based on the (adult) ICU surveillance component from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS)-System. Until now 113 German ICUs (most of them medical/surgical ICUs) were included in this system. We continuously collected and calculated the data from site-specific infections (device-associated pneumonias, blood stream infections and urinary tract infections). Results. There are now a total of 393.177 patient-days (100.015 patients) among them 176.415 ventilator-days, 295.221 central line-days and 316.799 urinary catheter-days in the data base. The data analysis showed the following device-associated infection rates: 11.2 pneumonias/1000 ventilator-days, 1.8 primary bloodstream infections/ 1000 central line-days and 4.0 urinary tract infections/1000 urinary catheter-days. Conclusion. The project has reached high interest in Germany and animated more ICUs to take part or to apply the same method in order to use the reference data for comparison.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Die fortlaufende, systematische Erfassung, Analyse und Interpretation (=Surveillance) nosokomialer Infektionsraten spielt die wesentliche Rolle bei der Problemidentifikation und der nachfolgenden Problemlösung im Rahmen der Infektionsprävention. Ziel des Nationalen Referenzzentrums für Krankenhaushygiene und des Robert Koch-Instituts war die Etablierung einer einheitlichen Surveillance-Methode auf mehreren Intensivstationen und die Bereitstellung der gewonnenen Daten als nationale Referenzdaten. Seit Januar 1997 wird für Deutschland eine Referenzdatenbank zur Surveillance nosokomialer Infektionen auf Intensivstationen aufgebaut. Auf 113 Intensivstationen wurden bisher die Daten von 100.015 Patienten (393.177 Patiententage) erfasst. Als Methode der Standardisierung wird die Anzahl der Infektionen, die während der Anwendung eines Risikofaktors auftreten (Harnwegskatheter, ZVK oder maschinelle Beatmung) auf die Anwendungshäufigkeit des Risikofaktors bezogen (“device”-assoziierte Infektionsrate). Folgende “device”-assoziierten Infektionsraten wurden ermittelt: 4, 0 Harnwegsinfektionen/1.000 Harnwegskathetertage, 1, 8 primäre Septikämien/1000 ZVK-Tage und 11, 2 Pneumonien/1.000 Beatmungstage (Mittelwerte). Durch den Vergleich der eigenen Daten mit denen der Referenzdatenbank haben Intensivstationen Gelegenheit, Anhaltspunkte für eine Optimierung von Präventionsmaßnahmen zu erhalten.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1439-0973
    Keywords: Key Words Nosocomial infections ; Intensive care units ; Benchmarking ; Quality management ; Surveillance
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Background: The objectives of this study were to determine to what extent the German national nosocomial infection surveillance system (Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System, KISS) can take into account the circumstances prevailing in various intensive care units (ICUs) and to establish whether KISS-ICU infection rates can serve as useful benchmark parameters. Methods: The investigation focused on three major factors: microbiological monitoring, severity of illness and the duration of surveillance. For each of these factors separate infection rates were calculated for various ICU groups and the differences compared. Results:Significant differences were found for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) with routine monitoring, but not for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Significant differences were assessed for central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI), considering the average ventilator utilization rate in the ICU as a surrogate parameter for the average severity of illness in its patient group. Surveillance periods of about 1 year were necessary to confirm definite outlier and nonoutlier positions for the majority of the ICUs. Conclusion: Using KISS data for internal orientation, it is possible to note important differences between ICUs when interpreting infection rates; some initial examples of successful use of surveillance data for the reduction of infection rates are already available. However, the use of such data for external assessment is not possible, because external observers are often unable to fully consider important factors in the interpretation of infection rates.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1435-1420
    Keywords: Key words Postoperative nosocomial pneumonia ; prevention ; Schlüsselwörter Postoperative noskomiale Pneumonie ; Prävention
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Neben hygienischen Maßnahmen bei postoperativer Beatmungstherapie liegt der Schwerpunkt der Bemühungen zur Prävention der postoperativen Pneumonie in der präoperativen Vorbereitung des Patienten und der Beeinflussung von endogenen Risikofaktoren sowohl in der präoperativen als auch postoperativen Phase. Wichtige Maßnahmen sind in diesem Zusammenhang die Optimierung der Behandlung einer chronischen Atemwegserkrankung, präoperatives Atemtraining bei Patienten mit eingeschränkteer Lungenfunktion bzw. postoperatives Abhusten, tiefes Atmen und Atemtherapie bei Risikopatienten, Einstellung von Rauchgewohnheiten, Optimierung der Therapie anderer prädisponierender Grunderkrankungen, Optimierung des Ernährungszustandes, adäquate Schmerztherapie bei Patienten mit operationsbedingten, atemabhängigen Beschwerden mit vorzugsweisem Einsatz von nicht sedierenden Analgetika, frühzeitige Mobilisierung und wenn möglich Reduktion oder passageres Absetzen einer immunsuppressiven Therapie. Es sollte außerdem beachtet werden, daß die Dauer der Hospitalisierung mit der Rate der nosokomialen Pneumonien korreliert. Die präoperative Vorbereitung und Beeinflussung von Risikofaktoren sollte wenn möglich ambulant durchgeführt werden. Eine stationäre Vorbereitung des Patienten kann die postoperative Pneumonierate erhöhen. Ansonsten ist auf die Einhaltung von Standardhygienemaßnahmen besonders bei Narkoseeinleitung und Narkoseausleitung, bei der Extubation, beim endotrachealen Absaugen, bei Anwendung von Medikamentenverneblern und Sauerstoffbefeuchtern zu achten. Wichtig ist außerdem die möglichst frühzeitige Entfernung von prädisponierenden exogenen Einflüssen wie die Entfernung von Ernährungssonden.
    Notes: Summary To prevent nosocomial pneumonia in the postoperative setting, it is important to take into account the endogenous risk factors in the preoperative and postoperative phase. This includes optimal drug therapy of an obstructive lung disease, respiratory therapy in the preoperative phase, use of an incentive spirometer or intermittent positive pressure breathing on patients at high risk of developing pneumonia in the postoperative phase, and instructing preoperative patients to stop smoking. Further measures are optimising the treatment of other predisposing diseases and the nutritional status, appropriate analgesic drug therapy in patients with postoperative pain during breathing, prefering nonsedative analgesic drugs, early mobilization, and withdrawal or reduction of immunsuppressive drugs in the preoperative and postoperative setting if not contraindicated. The preoperative phase of treatment should be managed in an ambulant setting, which is superior to hospitalization with respect to the nosocomial infection rate. There is also a positive correlation of the duration of postoperative hospital stay and the rate of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia. Thus, patients should not be hospitalized longer than necessary. Predisposing exogenous risk factors such as enteral feeding tubings should be replaced as soon as possible. Beside this, basic care and standard good quality hygienic measures are important in preventing postoperative pneumonia.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISSN: 1435-1420
    Keywords: Key words Pneumonia ; noso-comial pneumonia ; ventilator-associated pneumonia ; nosocomial infection ; hygiene ; Schlüsselwörter Pneumonie ; nosokomiale Pneumonie ; Beatmungspneumonie ; nosokomiale Infektion ; Hygiene
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Die Beatmungspneumonie ist die wichtigste nosokomiale Infektion auf Intensivstationen. Für deren Prävention sind vor allem Standardhygienemaßnahmen auf hohem Niveau, qualifiziertes Personal und regelmäßige Personalschulungen wichtig. Weitere Maßnahmen, die zu einer Reduktion der Pneumonierate beitragen können, sind: Oberkörperhochlagerung um 30 – 45° und kontinuierliche Infektionserfassung mit regelmäßiger Besprechung der Infektionsstatistik (Surveillance). Der Nutzen der ,Selektiven Darm Dekontamination` (SDD) und die Verwendung von Beatmungsfiltern sind als Präventivmaßnahmen nicht gesichert und somit derzeit nicht zu empfehlen. Auch bleibt der häufige Wechsel von Beatmungsschläuchen ohne Einfluß auf die Pneumonierate. Beatmungsschläuche müssen frühestens nach 7 Tagen gewechselt werden.
    Notes: Summary Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most important nosocomial infection on intensive care units. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia of 19 German hospitals is 18,5 pneumonias per 1000 ventilator-days. Although many preventive strategies have been proposed and evaluated in controlled trials, prevention of nosocomial pneumonia is still a topic of controversial discussions. Basic care of ventilated patients of a very good quality is the most important preventive strategy of VAP. This includes appropriate hand washing and other basic hygiene care. Additionally, an effective drainage of bronchopulmonary secretions has to be assured. It is furthermore of importance that the health care workers are well qualified, regularly educated and aware of the special hygiene aspects of intensive care medicine. Other procedures that might be effective in reducing VAP infection rates are: Semiupright position of the patients upper part of the body (30 – 45°) and continuous surveillance of infection rates. `Selective Digestive Decontamination' (SDD) and respiration-filters such as HME-filters and bacterial-filters can not be recommended at present due to the lack of scientific evidence of effectiveness in preventing VAP. Furthermore, no changes of ventilation-equipment are recommended every 48 hours. It is at least possible to change the equipment once a week without an additional risk for patients to acquire pneumonia.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    ISSN: 1435-1420
    Keywords: Key words Venous catheter infection ; sepsis ; intravascular device ; Schlüsselwörter Venenkatheter-infektion ; Sepsis ; Venenkatheter
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Unter den Katheter-assoziierten intravasalen Infektionen sind die Infektionen zentraler Venenkatheter (ZVK) und dadurch bedingte Blutstrominfektionen am wichtigsten. ZVK sollten daher nur gelegt und weiterverwendet werden, wenn sie erforderlich sind (z.B. periphere Venenkatheter als Alter-native prüfen). Außerdem sollten wegen des geringeren Infektionsrisikos aus hygienischer Sicht einlumige ZVK statt mehrlumiger Katheter verwendet und die Katheteranlage in der V. subclavia der in der V. jugularis interna vorgezogen werden. Vor der Punktion muß für eine Minute eine Wischdesinfektion (z.B. mit alkoholischem Desinfektionsmittel) durchgeführt werden (Sprühdesinfektion ist nicht ausreichend). Das Tragen von sterilen Handschuhen ersetzt nicht die Händedesinfektion. Um eine Kontamination des ZVK zu vermeiden, ist außerdem eine groß-flächige Abdeckung des Punktions-areals erforderlich. ZVK müssen nicht routinemäßig gewechselt werden. Bei Verdacht auf Venenkatheter-infektion mit oder ohne lokale Infektionszeichen muß der Katheter entfernt werden. Der tägliche Verbandswechsel mit Inspektion der Katheterinsertionsstelle ist nur bei bewußtseinseingeschränkten Patienten notwendig (Alternative: luftdurchlässiger Transparentverband). Ansonsten ist die tägliche Palpation der Inser-tionsstelle durch den Verband und Verbandswechsel bei Druckschmerz, Durchfeuchtung und Verschmutzung ausreichend. Infusionssysteme müssen nicht häufiger als nach 72 h gewechselt werden (Ausnahme: Verabreichung von Blut, Blutprodukten und lipidhaltigen Lösungen – in diesem Fall Infusionssystem innerhalb von 24 h wechseln). Vor Infusions-systemwechsel bzw. i.v. Applikationen müssen das Katheteransatzstück (hub) und Dreiwegehähne mit geeignetem Desinfektionsmittel abgewischt werden (Sprühdesinfektion ist nicht ausreichend). Periphere Venenkatheter (PVK) müssen nicht routinemäßig gewechselt werden (Ausnahme: notfallmäßig gelegte PVK – Katheterwechsel innerhalb von 24 h).
    Notes: Summary Infections caused by central venous catheters (CVC) and primary bloodstream infections are the most important infections due to intravascular devices. To prevent these infections, it is important to examine whether CVC is indicated or can be exchanged for other intravascular devices (e.g., peripheral venous catheter) which are known to have a lower infection rate. If CVC is necessary, a single-lumen catheter should be prefered as it is known that multi-lumen catheters are complicated by higher infection rates. With respect to intravascular infections, insertion into the subclavian vein is recommended and is superior to jugular vein insertions. The catheter insertion site must be disinfected by wiping the skin for one minute. Wearing sterile gloves is essential but cannot replace hand disinfection. Furthermore, large sterile draping is required for the insertion of CVC. Routine changes of central CVC are not necessary. CVC must be replaced immediately if there are any signs of device-related local or systemic infections. If the patients mental status is not altered, catheter-site dressings do not have to be changed routinely on a daily basis. Daily palpation of the catheter-insertion site is sufficient in this situation. Catheter-site dressings have to be changed if there is tenderness on palpation, when the dressings become damp, soiled or loose. Administration set changes are not recommended within 72 hours intervals. Intravenous tubing used to administer blood, blood products, or lipid emulsions, however, must be changed within 24 hours of completing the infusion. Before administration of liquids, hubs and three-way cocks must be disinfected by wiping with disinfectants. Peripheral venous catheters (PVC) do not have to be changed in routine intervals. If a PVC is inserted under emergency conditions, the catheter should be replaced within 24 hours.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    ISSN: 1435-1420
    Keywords: Key words Nosocomial urinary tract infection ; prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections ; evidence-based guidelines ; Schlüsselwörter Nosokomiale Harnweginfektionen ; Prävention Katheterassoziierter Harnweginfektionen ; evidenzbasierte Leitlinien
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Harnweginfektionen sind mit einem Anteil von ca. 40% die häufigsten nosokomialen Infektionen und in den meisten Fällen mit transurethralen Kathetern assoziiert. Die Empfehlungen der Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, USA) als international wichtigste, evidenz-basierte Leitlinien zur Prävention Katheterassoziierter Harnweginfektionen wurden im Jahre 1981 veröffentlicht und seitdem nicht aktualisiert. Evidenzbasierte nationale Empfehlungen sind in Deutschland bislang nicht verfügbar. Wir haben deshalb eine systematische Literaturrecherche nach randomisierten, kontrollierten Interventionsstudien zur Prävention Katheterassoziierter Harnweginfektionen durchgeführt (Medline, Cochrane Library, Durchsicht wichtiger Standardwerke). Insgesamt wurden 50 randomisierte, kontrollierte Interventionsstudien identifiziert, welche die Einschlußkriterien erfüllten. Wesentliche neue Erkenntnisse ergaben sich in den letzten Jahren zu Alternativen von transurethralen Kathetern und zu neuen Kathetermaterialien. Von den CDC-Empfehlungen ausgehend, deren wichtigste Prinzipien immer noch Gültigkeit besitzen, wurden vom Nationalen Referenzzentrum für Krankenhaushygiene* aktualisierte Leitlinien zur Prävention Katheter-assoziierter Harnweginfektionen entwickelt.
    Notes: Summary Urinary tract infections are the most frequent nosocomial infections, accounting for about 40% of all nosocomial infections. In most cases these infections are associated with indwelling urinary catheters. The guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, USA) for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, as the most important evidence-based guideline worldwide, was published in 1981 and has not been updated so far. Evidence-based national guidelines are not available in Germany. We have, therefore, performed a literature search for randomized, controlled studies on the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (Medline, Cochrane Library, reference text books) published since 1981. Fifty studies meeting our inclusion criteria were identified. Substantial new findings have been published on alternatives to urethral catheters and new catheter materials. Based upon the CDC guideline, whose principles are still valid, updated guidelines for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have been developed by the National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    ISSN: 1439-0973
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The first German national study on the prevalence of nosocomial and community-acquired infections was performed in 1994 in medical, surgical, gynaecological/obstetrical and intensive care departments. 14,966 patients in 72 German hospitals representatively selected according to size were investigated by outside physicians. These were trained in the use of CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, and their diagnoses validated. Community-acquired infections were recorded according to the assessment of the hospital physicians. For the diagnosis of nosocomial infections, only the opinion of the outside investigators was decisive. A prevalence of 3.5% was found for nosocomial infections and 10.0% for community-acquired infections. The use of antibiotics was documented in 17.7% of all patients on the prevalence day. Of the patients undergoing antibiotic therapy, 16.9% had a nosocomial infection, 47.9% a community-acquired one. In the remaining 35.1% neither a nosocomial nor a community-acquired infection was confirmed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    ISSN: 1439-0973
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Nosocomial infection (NI) was prospectively studied in hospitalized neonate during a 10-month period. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria (some specified for neonates) were used for surveillance. Forty-nine of 677 infants experienced 73 episodes of NI. The overall incidence was 10.8 NI/100 patients and 6.5 NI/1,000 patient days. The average monthly NI number did not correlate with patient load. Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants showed a higher NI incidence (81.8 NI/100 patients and 11.1 NI/1,000 patient days), also elevated if adjusted for their inherently longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. The most common NI sites in the VLBW stratum were sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), the latter occurring in a seasonal cluster. It can be concluded that surveillance for NIs should focus on VLBW infants and include the evaluation of NEC, as it behaves like a nosocomial disease.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...