ISSN:
0942-0940
Keywords:
Brain oedema
;
computerized tomography
;
intracranial hypertension
;
intracranial meningioma
;
seizures
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Summary The authors analysed the correlation between different clinical, radiological, and pathological variables and the presence and intensity of brain oedema associated to intracranial meningioma in 400 consecutive patients studied by computerized tomography (CT). The following factors did not show significant correlation with brain oedema development: the age and sex of the patient, the occurrence of focal deficits, the presence of skull changes (endostosis, exostosis, osteolysis), the occurrence of tumour calcification, the density of the tumour on plain CT scan, the presence of a cystic component, the pathological subtype of meningioma (both conventional and non-conventional), and the presence of histological features of tumour aggressiveness, such as an increased vascularization, high cellularity, high mitotic index, pleomorphism, necrosis, and brain infiltration. Factors showing a statistically significant correlation with the presence and intensity of brain oedema at the bivariate analysis were: the presence of symptoms (p 〈 0.001), the duration of the clinical history (p 〈 0.05), the location and size of the tumour (p 〈 0.001), the type (heterogeneous vs homogeneous), and intensity of tumour contrast enhancement (p 〈 0.001), the presence of irregular tumour margins (p 〈 0.001), and the existence of focal low density intratumoural areas (p 〈 0.001). The multivariate analysis using only clinical parameters showed that the group of variables with the highest power for predicting the presence of brain oedema (concordance level of 76.8%) included: the presence of symptoms, the occurrence of seizures (focal or generalized), the presence of an intracranial hypertension syndrome, and the age of the patient. The multivariate analysis using only anatomico-radiological parameters showed that the model which included the size of the tumour, the intensity of contrast enhancement, the tumour margins, and meningioma location, predicted the presence of brain oedema in 80.8% of the cases. Though the results of the present study do not definitively support any of the major physiopathological theories proposed to explain brain oedema formation in patients with intracranial meningioma, some findings could favour the so-called hydrodynamic theory.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01411166
Permalink
