Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography  (1)
  • Key words: Common bile duct stones — Gallbladder — Bile duct calculi — Laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography  (1)
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1084
    Keywords: Computed tomography studies ; Endoscopic ultrasonography ; cancer ; Mediastinum Neoplasms
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract In this prospective study endoscopic ultra-sound (EUS) and computed tomography (CC) were evaluated to compare diagnostic accuracy of the two methods. They were performed for nodal staging in selected patients admitted to our institution for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). from February 1992 to July 1993. 45 patients were recruited for the study When N3 and N2 nodal involvement were excluded on standard chest X-ray. All the patients completed EUS TS and CT exams for staging before treatment. The results of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were obtained in 30 patients who underwent surgical treatment with macroscopically radical resection of T and N. which allowed a complete surgical and histological comparison of CT and EUS findings. On a her-patient basis CT results were: sensitivity 63.0%. specificity 78.9 % and accuracy of 73.3 on a nodal station basis sensitivity: specificity and accuracy were 70.0%, 85.1% and 81.6% respectively. The EUS evaluation showed, on a per-patient basis, values of sensitivity 45.5%. specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy of 53.3%. On I nodal station basis the results were 50.0%,and 78.2% respectively. The results obtained in the 30 patients when both techniques were taken in association regarding sensitivity (90.9%), sspecificity (73.7%) and accuracy (80.0%) on a per-patient basis suggest that the assocation of EUS and CT offers the best approach for preoperative e staging of NSCL.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2218
    Keywords: Key words: Common bile duct stones — Gallbladder — Bile duct calculi — Laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are a frequent problem (10–15%) in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Over the last decade, new diagnostic and surgical techniques have expanded the options for their management. This report of the Consensus Development Conference is intended to summarize the current state of the art, including principal guidelines and an extensive review of the literature. Methods: An international panel of 12 experts met under the auspices of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives for gallstone disease. Prior to the conference, all the experts were asked to submit their arguments in the form of published results. All papers received were weighted according to their scientific quality and relevance. The preconsensus document compiled out of this correspondence was altered following a discussion of the external evidence made available by the panel members and presented at the public conference session. The personal experiences of the participants and other aspects of individualized therapy were also considered. Results: Our panel of experts agreed that the presence of common bile duct stones should be investigated in all patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Based on preoperative noninvasive diagnostics, either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiography should be employed for detecting CBDS. Eight of the 12 panelists recommended treating any diagnosed CBDS. For patients with no other extenuating circumstances, several treatment options exist. Stones can be extracted during ERCP, or either before or (in exceptional cases) after laparoscopic or open surgery. Bile duct clearance should always be combined with cholecystectomy. Evidence for further special aspects of CBDS treatment is equivocal and drawn from nonrandomized trials only. Conclusions: The management of common bile duct stones is currently undergoing some major changes. Many diagnostic and therapeutic strategies need further study.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...